John E. Hocking

898 citations
22 papers · 671 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Hocking

20 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

John E. Hocking
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Social Psychology 355
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 95
  • Clinical Psychology 166
  • Sociology and Political Science 322
Replace Harry Weger with:
Harry Weger United States
E. James Baesler United States
Robert N. Bostrom United States
Barbara J. O’Keefe United States
Fern L. Johnson United States
Eugenia Hanfmann United States
Thomas Birk United States
Robert A. Barraclough United States
Raymond K. Tucker United States
John G. Wirtz United States
John E. Hocking relative to Harry Weger United States Harry Weger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Harry Weger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Hocking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Hocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Hocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Hocking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Hocking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Hocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Hocking. The network helps show where John E. Hocking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John E. Hocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Hocking Line = papers co-authored together John E. Hocking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984133
2 198087
3 198078
4 197951
5 198048
6 198240
7 198235
8 196934
9
Essentials of communication research
199133
10 198833
11 200031
12 197724
13
The Effects of Videotape Testimony in Jury Trials: Studies on Juror Decision Making, Information Retention, and Emotional Arousal
197510
14 199910
15 19896
16 19906
17 19824
18 19853
19 20053
20 19902

About John E. Hocking

John E. Hocking is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (355 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (95 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (322 citations). John E. Hocking has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Miller, David Brandt, Charles K. Atkin, Dale G. Leathers, Martin P. Block, Don W. Stacks, Alexander E. Ellinger, Edward L. Fink, Barbara A. Walker and Mary Ann Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Human Communication Research, Journal of Communication, Journal of Adolescence, Communication Research Reports and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact