Thomas Foo

6.8k citations
153 papers · 4.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 39

Thomas Foo

145 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

Infarct Tissue Heterogeneity by Magnetic Resonance Imagin...5882007202620132019100200300400500

Peers

Thomas Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 3.6k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
  • Internal Medicine 171
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 810
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 105
Replace Christopher J. François with:
Christopher J. François United States
Gerhard Laub United States
J. Paul Finn United States
M. Thelen Germany
Jörg Barkhausen Germany
C B Higgins United States
Henrik J. Michaely Germany
James Carr United States
Michel Montaudon France
Hajime Sakuma Japan
Thomas Foo relative to Christopher J. François United States Christopher J. François's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Christopher J. François · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Foo. The network helps show where Thomas Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Foo Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20242
4 20241
5 20241
6 20245
7 20240
8 202313
9 20220
10 201929
11 2006121
12 200515
13 200112
14 199912
15 199685
16 199419
17 199239
18 199256
19 199217
20 199156

About Thomas Foo

Thomas Foo is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 153 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (124 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (56 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (34 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (28 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (11 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.6k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations) and Internal Medicine (171 citations). Thomas Foo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include David A. Bluemke, João A.C. Lima, Vincent B. Ho, Sandeep Gupta, Martin R. Prince, Thomas L. Chenevert, Manojkumar Saranathan, Kathérine C. Wu, Cecil E. Hayes and Matt A. Bernstein. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026