John D. Cox

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
44 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

John D. Cox is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John D. Cox has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 6 papers in History and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John D. Cox's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers) and Irish and British Studies (4 papers). John D. Cox is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers) and Irish and British Studies (4 papers). John D. Cox collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. John D. Cox's co-authors include Donald D Wagman, V. A. Medvedev, Matthew L. Cole, Jacqueline M. Stavros, Russ McDonald, D.F.C. Morris, H. A. Gundry, Juan-Francisco Martı́n, E. F. G. Herington and Peter Holbrook and has published in prestigious journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Frontiers in Psychology and The Journal of Southern History.

In The Last Decade

John D. Cox

34 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

CODATA key values for thermodynamics

1989 1.9k citations John D. Cox, Donald D Wagman et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John D. Cox United States	11	992	936	290	290	243	44	2.2k
Hisanobu Wakita Japan	25	983 1.0×	346 0.4×	668 2.3×	326 1.1×	403 1.7×	133	2.4k
A. Habenschuss United States	31	1.2k 1.2×	417 0.4×	625 2.2×	486 1.7×	599 2.5×	72	2.8k
G. Mamantov United States	33	947 1.0×	385 0.4×	295 1.0×	303 1.0×	118 0.5×	196	3.5k
Joseph A. Connor United Kingdom	30	1.0k 1.1×	2.0k 2.1×	542 1.9×	208 0.7×	81 0.3×	166	3.4k
Masunobu Maeda Japan	22	599 0.6×	373 0.4×	352 1.2×	99 0.3×	353 1.5×	112	1.9k
Fredrik Grønvold Norway	36	2.0k 2.1×	377 0.4×	303 1.0×	341 1.2×	69 0.3×	122	3.7k
H.A.C. McKay United Kingdom	26	586 0.6×	435 0.5×	103 0.4×	186 0.6×	393 1.6×	80	2.6k
H. Bertagnolli Germany	37	2.0k 2.0×	1.3k 1.4×	1.1k 3.7×	755 2.6×	129 0.5×	209	4.4k
M. H. Brooker Canada	27	1.0k 1.0×	126 0.1×	648 2.2×	230 0.8×	261 1.1×	86	2.5k
G. Pálinkás Hungary	35	1.1k 1.1×	531 0.6×	1.7k 5.8×	518 1.8×	537 2.2×	91	3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Cox

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Cox

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Cox. The network helps show where John D. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Cox. John D. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Cole, Matthew L., et al.. (2022). Measuring Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, and Results: Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item SOAR Scale. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 854406–854406. 5 indexed citations

2.

Cox, John D.. (2018). Shakespeare and Religion. Religions. 9(11). 343–343. 7 indexed citations

3.

Cole, Matthew L., John D. Cox, & Jacqueline M. Stavros. (2018). SOAR as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Collaboration Among Professionals Working in Teams: Implications for Entrepreneurial Teams. SAGE Open. 8(2). 18 indexed citations

4.

Cole, Matthew L., John D. Cox, & Jacqueline M. Stavros. (2016). Building collaboration in teams through emotional intelligence: Mediation by SOAR (strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results). Journal of Management & Organization. 25(2). 263–283. 18 indexed citations

5.

Cox, John D.. (2016). Stage Prayer in Marlowe and Jonson. Comparative drama. 50(1). 63–80. 2 indexed citations

6.

Cox, John D.. (2006). Was Shakespeare a Christian, and If So, What Kind of Christian Was He?. Christianity & Literature. 55(4). 539–566. 2 indexed citations

7.

Cox, John D.. (2002). Shakespeare and Political Philosophy. Philosophy and literature. 26(1). 107–124. 2 indexed citations

8.

Cox, John D.. (2000). The Devil and the Sacred in English Drama, 1350–1642. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 29 indexed citations

9.

Cox, John D. & Russ McDonald. (1997). The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare: An Introduction with Documents.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 48(4). 487–487. 10 indexed citations

10.

Cox, John D.. (1996). Devils and Vices in English Non-Cycle Plays: Sacrament and Social Body. Comparative drama. 30(2). 188–219.

11.

Cox, John D., et al.. (1995). Theatre and Government under the Early Stuarts. The Modern Language Review. 90(1). 144–144. 12 indexed citations

12.

Cox, John D.. (1994). The Devil and Society in the English Mystery Plays. Comparative drama. 28(4). 407–438.

13.

Cox, John D.. (1993). Devils and Power in Marlowe and Shakespeare. The Yearbook of English Studies. 23. 46–46. 3 indexed citations

14.

Cox, John D., et al.. (1992). The New Cambridge Shakespeare Henry VIII.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 43(1). 115–115. 1 indexed citations

15.

Cox, John D.. (1990). Nominalist Ethics and the New Historicism. Christianity & Literature. 39(2). 127–139. 1 indexed citations

16.

Cox, John D., Donald D Wagman, & V. A. Medvedev. (1989). CODATA key values for thermodynamics. 64(5). 956–64. 1924 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Cox, John D.. (1989). Renaissance Tragicomedy: Explorations in Genre and Politics ed. by Nancy Klein Maguire. Comparative drama. 23(4). 379–381.

18.

Cox, John D., et al.. (1959). 387. The preparation and physical properties of the pure lutidines. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed). 1934–1934. 11 indexed citations

19.

Cox, John D. & H. A. Gundry. (1958). 204. Heats of combustion. Part II. The six lutidines. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed). 1019–1019. 8 indexed citations

20.

Cox, John D., et al.. (1955). The occurrence of germanium in blende. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 8(3). 131–136. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact