John Clark
Impact in
- Archeology top 5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- James L. Phillips (1 shared paper)Robert H. Cowie (1 shared paper)Thurstan Shaw (1 shared paper)David Gaimster (1 shared paper)Christopher A. Baker (1 shared paper)Maxine R. Kleindienst (1 shared paper)Tillmann J. Benfey (1 shared paper)L. S. B. Leakey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medieval Archaeology (8 papers)Folklore (4 papers)The South African Archaeological Bulletin (2 papers)Science Fiction Studies (1 paper)Archaeological Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandCanada
In The Last Decade
John Clark
21 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Archeology 23
- Paleontology 76
- Anthropology 71
- Archeology 57
- Space and Planetary Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by John Clark
This map shows the geographic impact of John Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Clark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clark. The network helps show where John Clark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1974 | 68 | |
| 2 | The medieval horse and its equipment, c.1150-c.1450 | 1995 | 14 |
| 3 | 1972 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 10 | Hunza, Lost Kingdom of the Himalayas | 1956 | 5 |
| 11 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 19 | Ethnographic Archaeology : a possible Use for the Stone Bowls of the East African Neolithic Tradition | 1981 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1 |
About John Clark
John Clark is a scholar working on History, Classics, Anthropology, Paleontology and Archeology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (7 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (23 citations), Paleontology (76 citations), Anthropology (71 citations), Archeology (57 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (7 citations). John Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James L. Phillips, Robert H. Cowie, Thurstan Shaw, David Gaimster, Christopher A. Baker, Maxine R. Kleindienst, Tillmann J. Benfey and L. S. B. Leakey. Their work appears in journals such as Medieval Archaeology, Folklore, The South African Archaeological Bulletin, Science Fiction Studies and Archaeological Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.