John C. Leffingwell
- Polymers and Plastics top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Curt ThiesMerrick BankE. Earl RoyalsSusan S. SchiffmanHarald BluhmF. BuecheT. Yu. GagkaevaOlga Gavrilova
- Topics
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (3 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers)Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
John C. Leffingwell
19 papers receiving 534 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Polymers and Plastics 194
- Organic Chemistry 146
- Materials Chemistry 141
- Biomedical Engineering 90
- Molecular Biology 76
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Leffingwell
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Leffingwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Leffingwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Leffingwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Leffingwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Leffingwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Leffingwell. The network helps show where John C. Leffingwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Leffingwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Leffingwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Leffingwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Leffingwell. John C. Leffingwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | VOLATILE CONSTITUENTS OF PERIQUE TOBACCO | 61 |
| 4 | Chirality & Bioactivity I.: Pharmacology | 9 |
| 5 | Chemical Constituents of Tobacco Leaf and Differences Among Tobacco Types | 61 |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 194 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 |
About John C. Leffingwell
John C. Leffingwell is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (194 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (43 citations) and Organic Chemistry (146 citations). John C. Leffingwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Curt Thies, Merrick Bank, E. Earl Royals, Susan S. Schiffman, Harald Bluhm, F. Bueche, T. Yu. Gagkaeva and Olga Gavrilova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Applied Physics and Macromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.