John C. Erfurt
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrea FooteM. Anthony SchorkErnest HarburgWilliam J. SchullLouise S. HauensteinRobert W. ColmanR. C. RiceJ R Caldwell
- Topics
- Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
John C. Erfurt
23 papers receiving 960 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- General Health Professions 478
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 188
- Health 186
- Clinical Psychology 159
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 152
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Erfurt
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Erfurt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Erfurt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Erfurt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Erfurt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Erfurt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Erfurt. The network helps show where John C. Erfurt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Erfurt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Erfurt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Erfurt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Erfurt. John C. Erfurt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Work-site physical fitness programs. Comparing the impact of different program designs on cardiovascular risks. | 43 |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | STUDY AIMS AND SAMPLE FLOW | 2 |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 164 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About John C. Erfurt
John C. Erfurt is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (186 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations) and General Health Professions (478 citations). John C. Erfurt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Foote, M. Anthony Schork, Ernest Harburg, William J. Schull, Louise S. Hauenstein, Robert W. Colman, R. C. Rice and J R Caldwell. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Public Health and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.