Kate Irving

2.1k total citations
53 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Kate Irving is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Irving has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kate Irving's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (19 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers). Kate Irving is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (19 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers). Kate Irving collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Kate Irving's co-authors include Patrice Nony, François Berthézène, Jean‐Louis Terra, Fabrice Bonnet, Philippe Moulin, Bob Woods, Manuel Gonçalves‐Pereira, Frans R.J. Verhey, Orazio Zanetti and Louise Hopper and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Kate Irving

50 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Irving Ireland 18 579 397 285 236 213 53 1.3k
Daniela Figueiredo Portugal 25 600 1.0× 365 0.9× 195 0.7× 241 1.0× 217 1.0× 120 1.9k
R Newcomer United States 22 696 1.2× 414 1.0× 311 1.1× 271 1.1× 97 0.5× 36 1.4k
María Soto France 24 727 1.3× 973 2.5× 329 1.2× 235 1.0× 99 0.5× 53 1.9k
Brian Downer United States 21 350 0.6× 536 1.4× 163 0.6× 168 0.7× 99 0.5× 119 1.4k
Erin D. Bouldin United States 19 338 0.6× 298 0.8× 246 0.9× 198 0.8× 57 0.3× 102 1.3k
Anna Zisberg Israel 22 629 1.1× 190 0.5× 100 0.4× 204 0.9× 134 0.6× 71 1.8k
Ellen L. Brown United States 21 679 1.2× 505 1.3× 124 0.4× 246 1.0× 111 0.5× 53 1.4k
Deirdre A. Robertson Ireland 17 228 0.4× 458 1.2× 136 0.5× 188 0.8× 109 0.5× 39 1.9k
Xi Vivien Wu Singapore 25 400 0.7× 182 0.5× 125 0.4× 196 0.8× 119 0.6× 105 1.8k
Lesley Steinman United States 18 383 0.7× 263 0.7× 112 0.4× 196 0.8× 80 0.4× 56 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Irving

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Irving's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Irving with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Irving more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Irving

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Irving. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Irving. The network helps show where Kate Irving may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Irving

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Irving. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Irving based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Irving. Kate Irving is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gonçalves‐Pereira, Manuel, Maria J. Marques, Regina Alves, et al.. (2024). Sense of coherence, subjective burden, and anxiety and depression symptoms in caregivers of people with dementia: Causal dynamics unveiled by a longitudinal cohort study in Europe. Journal of Affective Disorders. 373. 1–11. 3 indexed citations
2.
Marques, Maria J., Bob Woods, Hannah Jelley, et al.. (2024). Addressing relationship quality of people with dementia and their family carers: which profiles require most support?. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. 1394665–1394665. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Murphy, Catríona, et al.. (2024). Understanding Therapeutic Lying In The Care Of A Person with Dementia: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Age and Ageing. 53(Supplement_4). 1 indexed citations
5.
Marques, Maria J., Bob Woods, Hannah Jelley, et al.. (2021). Trajectories of relationship quality in dementia: a longitudinal study in eight European countries. Aging & Mental Health. 26(11). 2307–2315. 10 indexed citations
6.
Janssen, Niels, Ron Handels, Sebastian Köhler, et al.. (2020). Profiles of Met and Unmet Needs in People with Dementia According to Caregivers’ Perspective: Results from a European Multicenter Study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 21(11). 1609–1616.e1. 11 indexed citations
7.
Marques, Maria J., Bob Woods, Louise Hopper, et al.. (2019). Relationship quality and sense of coherence in dementia: Results of a European cohort study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 34(5). 745–755. 15 indexed citations
8.
Kerpershoek, Liselot, Marjolein de Vugt, Claire Wolfs, et al.. (2019). Is there equity in initial access to formal dementia care in Europe? The Andersen Model applied to the Actifcare cohort. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 35(1). 45–52. 20 indexed citations
9.
OʼSullivan, Maria, et al.. (2019). Predicting admission to long‐term care and mortality among community‐based, dependent older people in Ireland. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 34(7). 999–1007. 27 indexed citations
10.
O’Shea, Emma, et al.. (2019). Multiple Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Respite Service Access for People With Dementia and Their Carers. The Gerontologist. 59(5). e490–e500. 13 indexed citations
11.
O’Shea, Emma, et al.. (2019). The perspectives of people with dementia on day and respite services: a qualitative interview study. Ageing and Society. 40(10). 2215–2237. 12 indexed citations
12.
Jelley, Hannah, Liselot Kerpershoek, Frans R.J. Verhey, et al.. (2019). Carers’ experiences of timely access to and use of dementia care services in eight European countries. Ageing and Society. 41(2). 403–420. 12 indexed citations
14.
O’Shea, Emma, et al.. (2017). Respite in Dementia: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Dementia. 18(4). 1446–1465. 21 indexed citations
16.
Bieber, Anja, Astrid Stephan, Hilde Verbeek, et al.. (2017). Access to community care for people with dementia and their informal carers. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 51(5). 530–536. 21 indexed citations
17.
Hopper, Louise, et al.. (2015). Ethical challenges associated with technology use with people with dementia. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Mark S., et al.. (2014). Positive About Dementia – an Interdisciplinary Project for Designing Dementia Education in Europe. European Health Psychologist. 16. 829. 1 indexed citations
19.
Irving, Kate & Marquis Foreman. (2006). Delirium, nursing practice and the future. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 1(2). 121–127. 18 indexed citations
20.
Ferguson, Eamonn, et al.. (1995). A measure of knowledge and confidence in relation to HIV and AIDS: Reliability and validity. AIDS Care. 7(2). 211–228. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026