This map shows the geographic impact of John Buschman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Buschman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Buschman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Buschman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Buschman. The network helps show where John Buschman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Buschman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Buschman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Buschman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Buschman. John Buschman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Buschman, John. (2016). Librarianship and the Arc of Crisis: The Road to Institutionalized Cultural Neoliberalism. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
6.
Buschman, John, et al.. (2016). Citizenship and Agency under Neoliberal Global Consumerism: A Search for Informed Democratic Practices/Response to Buschman. 25(1). 38–53.1 indexed citations
7.
Buschman, John. (2015). Of Law Schools and Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41(4). 521–522.1 indexed citations
8.
Buschman, John. (2013). Libraries and the Right to the City: Insights from Democratic Theory Prepared for the 2013 LACUNY Institute: Libraries, Information, and the Right to the City. CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York). 19(1). 11.2 indexed citations
9.
Buschman, John. (2012). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. 21(2). 135.49 indexed citations
Buschman, John. (2010). Alfabetización informacional, " nuevas" alfabetizaciones y alfabetización. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 25(98). 155–186.1 indexed citations
12.
Leckie, Gloria J., Lisa M. Given, & John Buschman. (2010). Critical theory for library and information science : exploring the social from across the disciplines. Libraries Unlimited eBooks.35 indexed citations
13.
Buschman, John. (2009). Who Defends Intellectual Freedom for Librarians. ACADEME University of Bohol Graduate School and Professional Studies. 95(5). 15–17.2 indexed citations
14.
Buschman, John, et al.. (2007). A Rough Measure of Copy Cataloging Productivity in the Academic Library. Library philosophy and practice. 1.5 indexed citations
15.
Buschman, John. (2006). On Not Revising The ALA Code of Ethics: an Alternate Proposal. Library philosophy and practice. 8(2). 4.2 indexed citations
16.
Buschman, John, et al.. (2005). Studying the Reader/Researcher Without the Artifact: Digital Problems in the Future History of Books. Library philosophy and practice. 7(1).2 indexed citations
17.
Buschman, John, et al.. (1999). Intellectual Freedom Within the Library Workplace: An Exploratory Study in the US. 8(2). 36–45.3 indexed citations
18.
Buschman, John. (1997). A Critical and Skeptical Overview of Electronic Publishing and Librarianship: Notes from the United States. Elpub digital library.1 indexed citations
19.
Buschman, John, et al.. (1996). Coping without a catalog for a semester. College & Research Libraries News. 57(4). 220–224.
20.
Buschman, John, et al.. (1993). The "Compleat" Library Organization: A Case Study of the Academic Library.. 7(2). 79–88.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.