John Box

574 citations
16 papers · 103 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ecology and biodiversity studies 3
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
    • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 2
    • Rangeland and Wildlife Management 2
    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services 4

John Box

16 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers

John Box
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 37
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
  • Ecology 40
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 18
  • Ecological Modeling 6
Replace Kees Hendriks with:
Kees Hendriks Netherlands
Stephanie Barr Canada
Debissa Lemessa Ethiopia
Camilo Bagnato Argentina
Frederike Velbert Germany
Rodrigo Lemes Martins Brazil
Denise Piechnik United States
B. de Knegt Netherlands
Betty R. Euliss United States
Pedro H. A. Sena Brazil
John Box relative to Kees Hendriks Netherlands Kees Hendriks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kees Hendriks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Box

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Box's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Box with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Box more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Box

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Box. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Box. The network helps show where John Box may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Box, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Box Line = papers co-authored together John Box links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200320
2 199620
3 199910
4 20109
5
Ecological considerations in the environmental assessment of road proposals
19927
6
Mistletoe Viscum album L. (Loranthaceae) on oaks in Britain.
20006
7 19986
8 20134
9 19944
10 20194
11
THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CITIES AND BIOSPHERE RESERVES
20003
12
Irrigation and Management of Texas Soils.
19592
13 19842
14 20102
15 20192
16 19942

About John Box

John Box is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Plant Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 103 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (2 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (37 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations), Ecology (40 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (18 citations) and Ecological Modeling (6 citations). John Box has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon J. Walker, Ian Douglas, Michael J. Webb, Andrew J. Hill, William F. Bennett and Mark Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Restoration Ecology, Water and Environment Journal, Water Research and Herpetological Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact