John Bell

74 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

John Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Theoretical Computer Science 47
  • History and Philosophy of Science 86
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 258
  • Mathematical Physics 90
  • Geometry and Topology 79
Replace Richard Kaye with:
Richard Kaye United Kingdom
Benedikt Löwe Netherlands
George Boole
Steve Awodey United States
Jan von Plato Finland
Hans Hermes Germany
John Myhill United States
Joseph W. Dauben United States
Daniel J. Velleman United States
R. L. Goodstein United Kingdom
John Bell relative to Richard Kaye United Kingdom Richard Kaye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Richard Kaye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bell. The network helps show where John Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bell Line = papers co-authored together John Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198776
2 201660
3
Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction
198855
4 198647
5 198644
6 199035
7 198134
8 201128
9 198217
10 201916
11 199016
12 202214
13 198214
14 199313
15 199312
16 201412
17 199711
18 201710
19 19939
20 20199

About John Bell

John Bell is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 83 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (24 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (21 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (6 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (47 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (86 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (258 citations), Mathematical Physics (90 citations) and Geometry and Topology (79 citations). John Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Flynn, Kyojin Choo, D. H. Fremlin, Michael Hallett, James L. Salzer, Arie Struyk, Daniel Afar, Liliana Pedraza, Chunyang Zhai and Jeffrey A. Fredenburg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Axiomathes, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Archive for Mathematical Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact