John B. Emans
- Surgery top 0.2%
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 140
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 134
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 50
- Hip disorders and treatments 29
- Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies 9
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 42
- Genetics top 5%
- Connective tissue disorders research 15
- Genetics top 5%
- Connective tissue disorders research 15
-
- Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations 11
- Co-authors
- Daniel HedequistJohn E. HallBehrooz A. AkbarniaJames R. KasserPaul D. SponsellerDavid L. SkaggsGeorge H. ThompsonDaniel J. Sucato
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John B. Emans
218 papers receiving 6.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Surgery 6.4k
- Rehabilitation 649
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.6k
- Genetics 544
- Genetics 167
Countries citing papers authored by John B. Emans
This map shows the geographic impact of John B. Emans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John B. Emans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John B. Emans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John B. Emans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John B. Emans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John B. Emans. The network helps show where John B. Emans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John B. Emans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 80 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 134 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 310 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 9 |
About John B. Emans
John B. Emans is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Chemical Health and Safety, Rehabilitation and Developmental Biology, having authored 226 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (140 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (134 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (50 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (42 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (29 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (15 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (11 papers) and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (6.4k citations), Rehabilitation (649 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.6k citations), Genetics (544 citations) and Genetics (167 citations). John B. Emans has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Hedequist, John E. Hall, Behrooz A. Akbarnia, James R. Kasser, Paul D. Sponseller, David L. Skaggs, George H. Thompson, Daniel J. Sucato, Muharrem Yazıcı and Richard M. Schwend. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Spine, Spine Deformity, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.