John T. Smith

3.9k citations
111 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 27

John T. Smith

110 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Surgery 2.1k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 490
  • Rehabilitation 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 77
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 218
Replace Edward Benzel with:
Edward Benzel United States
John C. France United States
Simon Kay United Kingdom
George S. Bassett United States
Hossein Mehdian United Kingdom
Andrew C. Smith United States
Steven W. Hwang United States
Patrick G. Harris Canada
William F. Lavelle United States
Seung Woo Suh South Korea
John T. Smith relative to Edward Benzel United States Edward Benzel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Edward Benzel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Smith. The network helps show where John T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20222
2 20223
3 20226
4
Management of Early-Onset Scoliosis-From Mehta Casts to Magnetically Expandable Rods: State of the Art in 2019.
20202
5 20208
6 20203
7 202021
8 20181
9 201624
10 20154
11 201557
12 20139
13 201035
14 200857
15 200820
16 20041
17 200382
18 200230
19
Postoperative epidural analgesia for pediatric spine surgery.
199837
20 198818

About John T. Smith

John T. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Complementary and Manual Therapy, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (68 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (57 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (23 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (18 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (11 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers) and Connective tissue disorders research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (2.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (490 citations), Rehabilitation (124 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (77 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (218 citations). John T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Stevens, Michael G. Vitale, David L. Skaggs, John M. Flynn, John B. Emans, Sohrab Gollogly, Randal R. Betz, Douglas L. Brockmeyer, Kevin S. Masters and Hiroko Matsumoto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Spine Deformity, Spine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026