Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
CaImAn an open source tool for scalable calcium imaging data analysis
2019461 citationsAndrea Giovannucci, Johannes Friedrich et al.eLifeprofile →
Efficient and accurate extraction of in vivo calcium signals from microendoscopic video data
2018417 citationsPengcheng Zhou, Shanna L. Resendez et al.eLifeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Friedrich
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Friedrich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johannes Friedrich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Friedrich. The network helps show where Johannes Friedrich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johannes Friedrich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johannes Friedrich.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johannes Friedrich based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johannes Friedrich. Johannes Friedrich is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Giovannucci, Andrea, Johannes Friedrich, Pat Gunn, et al.. (2019). CaImAn an open source tool for scalable calcium imaging data analysis. eLife. 8.461 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Zhou, Pengcheng, Shanna L. Resendez, Jose Rodríguez-Romaguera, et al.. (2018). Efficient and accurate extraction of in vivo calcium signals from microendoscopic video data. eLife. 7.417 indexed citations breakdown →
Giovannucci, Andrea, Johannes Friedrich, Anne K. Churchland, et al.. (2017). OnACID: Online Analysis of Calcium Imaging Data in Real Time. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). 30. 2381–2391.4 indexed citations
10.
Friedrich, Johannes, et al.. (2017). The Data Platform for Climate Research and Action: Introducing Climate Watch. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
11.
Friedrich, Johannes, et al.. (2017). 6 Charts to Understand U.S. State Greenhouse Gas Emissions.2 indexed citations
12.
Friedrich, Johannes & Liam Paninski. (2016). Fast Active Set Methods for Online Spike Inference from Calcium Imaging. Neural Information Processing Systems. 29. 1984–1992.16 indexed citations
Friedrich, Johannes, et al.. (1976). The Allegory of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar in the Argument of Galatians. 1–16.6 indexed citations
19.
Hoffner, Harry A. & Johannes Friedrich. (1969). Hethitisches Elementarbuch. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 89(1). 168–168.7 indexed citations
20.
Goetze, Albrecht & Johannes Friedrich. (1954). Hethitisches Wörterbuch. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 74(3). 186–186.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.