Johanna Klaus
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health, psychology, and well-being 3
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 5
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Pharmacy top 10%
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 6
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 3
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 4
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- David W. OslinJames D. TewShahrzad MavandadiMaría M. LlabreBarry E. HurwitzJay S. SkylerNeil SchneidermanJeffrey M. Greeson
- Journals
- Psychiatric Services (7 papers)American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)Psychological Services (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Johanna Klaus
24 papers receiving 534 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Emergency Medicine 77
- Nutrition and Dietetics 111
- General Health Professions 151
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Pharmacy 22
Countries citing papers authored by Johanna Klaus
This map shows the geographic impact of Johanna Klaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johanna Klaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johanna Klaus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johanna Klaus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johanna Klaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johanna Klaus. The network helps show where Johanna Klaus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johanna Klaus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 33 |
About Johanna Klaus
Johanna Klaus is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (77 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (111 citations), General Health Professions (151 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations) and Pharmacy (22 citations). Johanna Klaus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David W. Oslin, James D. Tew, Shahrzad Mavandadi, María M. Llabre, Barry E. Hurwitz, Jay S. Skyler, Neil Schneiderman, Jeffrey M. Greeson, Peter J. Lawrence and Kevin Maher. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychological Services, Journal of Affective Disorders and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.