Joel Quirk

856 citations
25 papers · 383 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joel Quirk

21 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Joel Quirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Development 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 141
  • Anthropology 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 226
  • Public Administration 11
Replace Salvador Martí i Puig with:
Salvador Martí i Puig Spain
David Sogge Spain
Julius E. Nyang’oro United States
Lesley Gill United States
Teresa Hayter United Kingdom
Tom Young United Kingdom
Rahel Kunz Switzerland
Neera Chandhoke India
Giovanni Carbone Italy
Gina M.S. Lambright United States
Joel Quirk relative to Salvador Martí i Puig Spain Salvador Martí i Puig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Salvador Martí i Puig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joel Quirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Quirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Quirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Quirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joel Quirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Quirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Quirk. The network helps show where Joel Quirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Joel Quirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joel Quirk Line = papers co-authored together Joel Quirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 200640
3 201138
4 201535
5 200531
6 201218
7 200717
8 200815
9 200811
10
Slavery, migration and contemporary bondage in Africa
201311
11 20107
12 20096
13 20126
14 20183
15
International relations’ first great debate: context and tradition
20043
16 20103
17 20222
18 20251
19
Representing ‘hidden’ populations : a symposium on sampling techniques
20131
20 20091

About Joel Quirk

Joel Quirk is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (12 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (5 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (53 citations), Political Science and International Relations (141 citations), Anthropology (53 citations), Sociology and Political Science (226 citations) and Public Administration (11 citations). Joel Quirk has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include André Broome, Darshan Vigneswaran, David Richardson, Gerry Johnstone, Jackie Dugard, Benedetta Rossi and Yongjin Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Review of International Studies, Human Rights Quarterly, Slavery and Abolition, International Relations and Journal of Human Rights.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact