This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Wallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Wallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Wallis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Wallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Wallis. The network helps show where Joe Wallis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joe Wallis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joe Wallis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joe Wallis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joe Wallis. Joe Wallis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wallis, Joe & Brian Dollery. (2010). Alternatywne mechanizmy rządzenia na szczeblu samorządów lokalnych z perspektywy nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej. 71–88.4 indexed citations
Dollery, Brian & Joe Wallis. (2003). The political economy of the voluntary sector : a reappraisal of the comparative institutional advantage of voluntary organizations. RUNE (Research UNE).9 indexed citations
9.
Wallis, Joe & Brian Dollery. (2002). Policy leadership styles and the process of paradigmatic policy change: three propositions. Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.