This map shows the geographic impact of Jody Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jody Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jody Hughes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jody Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jody Hughes. The network helps show where Jody Hughes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jody Hughes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jody Hughes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jody Hughes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jody Hughes. Jody Hughes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alexander, Michael J., et al.. (2006). Australians working together: evaluation of the impact of activity requirements for parenting payment customers on their children aged 13–15 years.4 indexed citations
5.
Hughes, Jody & Matthew Gray. (2005). The Use of Family-friendly Work Arrangements by Lone and Couple Mothers. Family matters. 18.5 indexed citations
6.
Gray, Matthew & Jody Hughes. (2005). Caring for children and adults: Differential access to family-friendly work arrangements. Family matters.12 indexed citations
7.
Gray, Matthew & Jody Hughes. (2005). Caring for Children and Adults: Differential Access to Family-friendly Work. Family matters. 18.1 indexed citations
8.
Hand, Kelly & Jody Hughes. (2005). Mothers' attitudes to parenting and paid work: A typology?.1 indexed citations
9.
Hand, Kelly & Jody Hughes. (2004). Mothers' Reflections about Work and Family Life. Family matters. 44.9 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Wendy, Matthew Gray, & Jody Hughes. (2003). Social capital at work How family, friends and civic ties relate to labour market outcomes. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).43 indexed citations
11.
Hughes, Jody & Wendy Stone. (2003). Family and Community Life - Exploring the Decline Thesis. Family matters. 40.2 indexed citations
12.
Stone, Wendy & Jody Hughes. (2002). Understanding Community Strengths. Family matters. 62.14 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Wendy & Jody Hughes. (2002). Measuring Social Capital: Towards a standardised approach. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).18 indexed citations
14.
Stone, Wendy, Matthew Gray, & Jody Hughes. (2002). Social capital at work : an Australian illustration. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 6(3). 55.6 indexed citations
15.
Stone, Wendy & Jody Hughes. (2001). Social capital: Linking family and community?. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).2 indexed citations
16.
Stone, Wendy & Jody Hughes. (2001). Sustaining communities: An empirical investigation of social capital in regional Australia. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).15 indexed citations
17.
Hughes, Jody. (2000). Repartnering after divorce: marginal mates and unwedded women. Family matters. 16.21 indexed citations
18.
Hughes, Jody, et al.. (2000). The division of matrimonial property in Australia: What is a fair settlement?. Family matters. 55(55). 28–33.2 indexed citations
19.
Stone, Wendy & Jody Hughes. (2000). WHAT ROLE FOR SOCIAL CAPITAL IN FAMILY POLICY. 20–27.15 indexed citations
20.
Weston, Ruth & Jody Hughes. (1999). Family forms: family well being. Family matters. 14.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.