Herbert Heuer

7.2k total citations
194 papers, 5.0k citations indexed

About

Herbert Heuer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Herbert Heuer has authored 194 papers receiving a total of 5.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 152 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 61 papers in Social Psychology and 43 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Herbert Heuer's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (115 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (57 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (40 papers). Herbert Heuer is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (115 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (57 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (40 papers). Herbert Heuer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Herbert Heuer's co-authors include Mathias Hegele, Thomas Kleinsorge, Will Spijkers, Volker Schmidtke, Sandra Sülzenbrück, Steven W. Keele, Ulrich Mayr, Eliot Hazeltine, Richard B. Ivry and Wolfgang Jaschinski and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Herbert Heuer

190 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Herbert Heuer Germany 37 4.0k 2.0k 849 811 621 194 5.0k
Yves Paulignan France 28 3.3k 0.8× 2.0k 1.0× 977 1.2× 732 0.9× 655 1.1× 44 4.0k
Howard N. Zelaznik United States 34 4.2k 1.1× 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 1.3× 1.0k 1.3× 764 1.2× 77 5.4k
David Α. Rosenbaum United States 42 6.1k 1.5× 3.0k 1.5× 2.1k 2.4× 1.2k 1.4× 727 1.2× 154 7.5k
Aymeric Guillot France 41 3.2k 0.8× 2.1k 1.1× 2.9k 3.4× 759 0.9× 330 0.5× 146 5.7k
Paul L. Gribble Canada 37 4.0k 1.0× 1.5k 0.7× 515 0.6× 2.3k 2.8× 419 0.7× 98 5.0k
Eiichi Naito Japan 32 3.5k 0.9× 1.4k 0.7× 558 0.7× 591 0.7× 482 0.8× 102 4.7k
Lorna S. Jakobson Canada 27 3.2k 0.8× 1.1k 0.5× 506 0.6× 397 0.5× 451 0.7× 76 4.3k
Paul Cisek Canada 39 6.3k 1.6× 2.2k 1.1× 668 0.8× 750 0.9× 534 0.9× 83 7.5k
Éric Roy Canada 31 2.5k 0.6× 971 0.5× 645 0.8× 360 0.4× 200 0.3× 116 3.3k
Timothy D. Lee Canada 36 3.3k 0.8× 1.7k 0.9× 2.4k 2.9× 1.1k 1.4× 406 0.7× 98 5.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Heuer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Heuer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Heuer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Heuer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Heuer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Heuer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Heuer. The network helps show where Herbert Heuer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Heuer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Heuer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Heuer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Heuer. Herbert Heuer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heuer, Herbert & Peter Wühr. (2024). The functional role of the task-irrelevant stimulus feature in the congruency sequence effect.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 51(5). 704–736. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wühr, Peter & Herbert Heuer. (2024). Where does the processing of size meet the processing of space?. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 87(4). 1230–1248.
3.
Kayser, Christoph, et al.. (2024). Both stimulus‐specific and configurational features of multiple visual stimuli shape the spatial ventriloquism effect. European Journal of Neuroscience. 59(7). 1770–1788. 2 indexed citations
4.
Heuer, Herbert & Peter Wühr. (2023). The Impact of Speed-Accuracy Instructions on Spatial Congruency Effects. Journal of Cognition. 6(1). 49–49. 1 indexed citations
5.
Heuer, Herbert, Christian Seegelke, & Peter Wühr. (2023). Staggered Onsets of Processing Relevant and Irrelevant Stimulus Features Produce Different Dynamics of Congruency Effects. Journal of Cognition. 6(1). 8–8. 10 indexed citations
6.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2023). Short-term effects of visuomotor discrepancies on multisensory integration, proprioceptive recalibration, and motor adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 129(2). 465–478. 3 indexed citations
7.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2023). Different time scales of common‐cause evidence shape multisensory integration, recalibration and motor adaptation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 58(5). 3253–3269. 3 indexed citations
8.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2021). Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 21640–21640. 7 indexed citations
9.
Wühr, Peter & Herbert Heuer. (2021). Mapping effects in choice-response and go/no-go variants of the lexical decision task: A case for polarity correspondence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 75(3). 491–507. 4 indexed citations
10.
Wühr, Peter & Herbert Heuer. (2020). To respond or not to respond? A model-based comparison between the processing of go, nogo, and neutral stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 46(5). 525–549. 5 indexed citations
11.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2020). Exploring the time window for causal inference and the multisensory integration of actions and their visual effects. Royal Society Open Science. 7(8). 192056–192056. 7 indexed citations
12.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2018). Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy can reduce the strength of multisensory integration. Psychological Research. 84(4). 890–906. 14 indexed citations
13.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2018). Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 9796–9796. 19 indexed citations
14.
Ernst, Marc O., et al.. (2017). Kinematic cross‐correlation induces sensory integration across separate objects. European Journal of Neuroscience. 46(12). 2826–2834. 23 indexed citations
15.
Wühr, Peter & Herbert Heuer. (2015). The impact of response frequency on spatial stimulus–response correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica. 162. 13–19. 4 indexed citations
16.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (2013). The Influence of Robotic Guidance on Different Types of Motor Timing. Journal of Motor Behavior. 45(3). 249–258. 15 indexed citations
17.
Schmidt, Klaus‐Helmut, Barbara Neubach, & Herbert Heuer. (2007). Self-control demands, cognitive control deficits, and burnout. Work & Stress. 21(2). 142–154. 87 indexed citations
18.
Jaschinski, Wolfgang, et al.. (1998). Fixation disparity, accommodation, dark vergence and dark focus during inclined gaze.. PubMed. 18(4). 351–9. 15 indexed citations
19.
Heuer, Herbert, et al.. (1988). The effects of sustained vertical gaze deviation on the resting state of the vergence system. Vision Research. 28(12). 1337–1344. 29 indexed citations
20.
Heuer, Herbert, Uwe Kleinbeck, Kristina Schmidt, & John Annett. (1985). Motor behavior : programming, control, and acquisition. Springer eBooks. 173 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026