Jochen De Weerdt

3.4k citations
81 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 24

Jochen De Weerdt

76 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jochen De Weerdt
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Management Information Systems 843
  • Information Systems 761
  • Computer Science Applications 170
  • Management Science and Operations Research 316
  • Artificial Intelligence 596
Replace Maya Daneva with:
Maya Daneva Netherlands
Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay United States
Chiara Francalanci Italy
Willem‐Jan van den Heuvel Netherlands
William Yeoh Australia
Chuanren Liu United States
Mark C. Paulk United States
Sumit Sarkar United States
Juheng Zhang United States
Pnina Soffer Israel
Jochen De Weerdt relative to Maya Daneva Netherlands Maya Daneva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maya Daneva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen De Weerdt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen De Weerdt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen De Weerdt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen De Weerdt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen De Weerdt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen De Weerdt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen De Weerdt. The network helps show where Jochen De Weerdt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen De Weerdt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen De Weerdt Line = papers co-authored together Jochen De Weerdt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20240
5 20244
6 20242
7 20245
8 202320
9 20238
10 20235
11 20231
12 20234
13 202213
14 202210
15 202036
16 201924
17 201438
18 201419
19 201430
20
BPIC 2013. Business Process Intelligence Challenge 2013. Proceedings of the 3rd Business Process Intelligence Challenge co-located with 9th International Business Process Intelligence Workshop (BPI 2013), Beijing, China, August 26, 2013
20133

About Jochen De Weerdt

Jochen De Weerdt is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (47 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (26 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (16 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (10 papers), Data Quality and Management (10 papers), Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques (7 papers), Data Stream Mining Techniques (7 papers) and Topic Modeling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (843 citations), Information Systems (761 citations) and Computer Science Applications (170 citations). Jochen De Weerdt has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bart Baesens, Jan Vanthienen, Seppe K. L. M. vanden Broucke, Monique Snoeck, Seppe vanden Broucke, Galina Deeva, Johannes De Smedt, Manu De Backer, Estefanía Serral and Sandra Mitrović. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Computers in Human Behavior and Expert Systems with Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026