Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Maya Daneva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maya Daneva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maya Daneva more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maya Daneva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maya Daneva. The network helps show where Maya Daneva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maya Daneva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maya Daneva.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maya Daneva based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maya Daneva. Maya Daneva is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2018). Empirical validation of a software requirements specification checklist. University of Twente Research Information. 2075.3 indexed citations
Daneva, Maya. (2015). Focus group: cost-effective and methodologically sound ways to get practitioners involved in your empirical RE research. University of Twente Research Information. 211–216.5 indexed citations
Condorí-Fernández, Nelly, Roelf J. Wieringa, Maya Daneva, Bela Mutschler, & Óscar Pastor. (2012). An Experimental Evaluation of a Unified Checklist for Designing and Reporting Empirical Research in Software Engineering. University of Twente Research Information.4 indexed citations
11.
Condorí-Fernández, Nelly, Maya Daneva, & Roelf J. Wieringa. (2012). Preliminary Survey on Empirical Research Practices in Requirements Engineering. University of Twente Research Information.3 indexed citations
12.
Daneva, Maya, Klaas Sikkel, Nelly Condorí-Fernández, & Andrea Herrmann. (2011). Experiences in Using Practitioner’s Checklists to Evaluate the Relevance of Experiments Reported in Requirements Engineering. University of Twente Research Information.1 indexed citations
13.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2009). Reprioritizing the Requirements in Agile Software Development: Towards a Conceptual Model from Clients' Perspective. University of Twente Research Information. 73–80.2 indexed citations
14.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2008). Validating the domains of an inter-organizational business-IT alignment assessment instrument: A case study. CTIT technical report series.1 indexed citations
15.
Wieringa, Roelf J., et al.. (2007). Towards Information Systems Design for Value Webs. University of Twente Research Information. 453–460.3 indexed citations
16.
Kassab, Mohamad, Maya Daneva, & Olga Ormandjieva. (2007). Early Quantitative Assessment of Non-Functional Requirements. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).11 indexed citations
17.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2007). Developing an inter-enterprise alignment maturity model: research challenges and solutions. 51–60.9 indexed citations
18.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2007). What Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Systems Usage Can and Can not Tell about Each Other. University of Twente Research Information.4 indexed citations
19.
Daneva, Maya. (2006). Applying Real Options Thinking to Information Security in Networked Organizations. University of Twente Research Information.21 indexed citations
20.
Daneva, Maya, et al.. (2006). Challenges and Solutions in Planning Information Systems for Networked Value Constellations. University of Twente Research Information. 119–131.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.