Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges
2019251 citationsRehan Syed, Michael Adams et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Moe Thandar Wynn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Moe Thandar Wynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moe Thandar Wynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moe Thandar Wynn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moe Thandar Wynn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moe Thandar Wynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moe Thandar Wynn. The network helps show where Moe Thandar Wynn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Moe Thandar Wynn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Moe Thandar Wynn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Moe Thandar Wynn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Moe Thandar Wynn. Moe Thandar Wynn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andrews, Robert, Moe Thandar Wynn, Kirsten Vallmuur, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, & Emma Bosley. (2020). A Comparative Process Mining Analysis of Road Trauma Patient Pathways. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(10). 3426–3426.14 indexed citations
Wynn, Moe Thandar, Hajo A. Reijers, Michael Adams, et al.. (2013). Cost-informed operational process support. Lecture notes in computer science. 1304.4 indexed citations
14.
Wynn, Moe Thandar, et al.. (2013). A framework for cost-aware process management : generation of accurate and timely management accounting cost reports. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).6 indexed citations
15.
Wynn, Moe Thandar, et al.. (2013). A process-oriented approach to supporting off-site manufacture in construction projects. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).8 indexed citations
Ouyang, Chun, Moe Thandar Wynn, Jan-Christian Kuhr, et al.. (2011). WORKFLOW SUPPORT FOR SCHEDULING IN SURGICAL CARE PROCESSES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 30.3 indexed citations
18.
Dumas, Marlon, et al.. (2009). Synthesis of orchestrators from service choreographies. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 129–138.9 indexed citations
19.
Verbeek, H. M. W., Moe Thandar Wynn, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, & Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. (2009). Reduction rules for reset/inhibitor nets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 76(2). 125–143.22 indexed citations
20.
Aalst, Wil M. P. van der, K.M. van Hee, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, et al.. (2008). Soundness of workflow nets : classification, decidability, and analysis. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 813.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.