Joanna Redden

979 total citations
18 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Joanna Redden is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Joanna Redden has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Communication, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Joanna Redden's work include Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). Joanna Redden is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). Joanna Redden collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Joanna Redden's co-authors include Lina Dencik, Arne Hintz, Emiliano Treré, Fenwick McKelvey, Greg Elmer, Ganaele Langlois, Stuart Allan, Luke Stark, Jodi Hall and Gail Teachman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Information Communication & Society and First Monday.

In The Last Decade

Joanna Redden

16 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Joanna Redden
Morgan Currie United Kingdom
Su-ming Khoo Ireland
Giles Moss United Kingdom
Daniel Teodorescu United States
Joanna Redden
Citations per year, relative to Joanna Redden Joanna Redden (= 1×) peers Seeta Peña Gangadharan

Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Redden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Redden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Redden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Redden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Redden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Redden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Redden. The network helps show where Joanna Redden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanna Redden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanna Redden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanna Redden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanna Redden. Joanna Redden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Dencik, Lina, Arne Hintz, Joanna Redden, & Emiliano Treré. (2025). Collectivity in data governance and data justice. Information Communication & Society. 28(6). 943–950. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hall, Jodi, et al.. (2025). Femtech in context: A critical conceptual (re)view. Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine. 526887231–526887231.
3.
McKelvey, Fenwick, Joanna Redden, Jonathan Roberge, & Luke Stark. (2024). (Un)stable diffusions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(4). 1–12. 1 indexed citations
5.
Dencik, Lina, Arne Hintz, Joanna Redden, & Emiliano Treré. (2022). Data Justice. 32 indexed citations
6.
Redden, Joanna. (2020). Predictive Analytics and Child Welfare: Toward Data Justice. Canadian Journal of Communication. 45(1). 101–111. 7 indexed citations
7.
Redden, Joanna, et al.. (2020). Datafied child welfare services: unpacking politics, economics and power. Policy Studies. 41(5). 507–526. 46 indexed citations
8.
Beer, David G., et al.. (2019). Landscape summary: Online targeting: What is online targeting, what impact does it have, and how can we maximise benefits and minimise harms?. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 1 indexed citations
9.
Dencik, Lina, et al.. (2019). The ‘golden view’: data-driven governance in the scoring society. Internet Policy Review. 8(2). 55 indexed citations
10.
Dencik, Lina, Arne Hintz, Joanna Redden, & Emiliano Treré. (2019). Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions. Information Communication & Society. 22(7). 873–881. 162 indexed citations
11.
Dencik, Lina, et al.. (2018). Data scores as Governance: Investigating uses of citizen scoring in public services project report. Goldsmiths (University of London). 15 indexed citations
12.
Redden, Joanna. (2018). Democratic governance in an age of datafication: Lessons from mapping government discourses and practices. Big Data & Society. 5(2). 61 indexed citations
13.
Allan, Stuart & Joanna Redden. (2017). Making citizen science newsworthy in the era of big data. Journal of Science Communication. 16(2). C05–C05. 3 indexed citations
14.
Redden, Joanna. (2014). The Mediation of Poverty. Lexington Books. 2 indexed citations
15.
Redden, Joanna. (2014). The Mediation of Poverty: The News, New Media, and Politics. Goldsmiths (University of London). 3 indexed citations
16.
Redden, Joanna. (2011). POVERTY IN THE NEWS. Information Communication & Society. 14(6). 820–849. 37 indexed citations
17.
Elmer, Greg, et al.. (2009). “Blogs I Read”: Partisanship and Party Loyalty in the Canadian Political Blogosphere. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 6(2). 156–165. 9 indexed citations
18.
Elmer, Greg, et al.. (2007). Election bloggers: Methods for determining political influence. First Monday. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026