Giles Moss
- Communication top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Marketing top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen ColemanHelen KennedyLee EdwardsIsabelle SchuilingBethany KleinBen O’LoughlinDavid M. BerryDavid Lee
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (15 papers)Copyright and Intellectual Property (6 papers)E-Government and Public Services (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Giles Moss
34 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Communication 259
- Sociology and Political Science 193
- Political Science and International Relations 165
- Artificial Intelligence 58
- Marketing 51
Countries citing papers authored by Giles Moss
This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Moss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Moss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Moss. The network helps show where Giles Moss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giles Moss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giles Moss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giles Moss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giles Moss. Giles Moss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | Studying Real-Time Audience Responses to Political Messages: A New Research Agenda | 4 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Urban Communication| Researching Local News in a Big City: A Multimethod Approach | 3 |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | The Mediated City: The News in a Post-Industrial Context | 6 |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | The 2015 Televised Election Debates; Democracy on Demand? | 3 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | Libre culture: meditations on free culture | 4 |
| 18 | Libre Commons = Libre Culture + Radical Democracy | 1 |
| 19 | Staying in touch? The potential of 'Friends Reunited' as a research tool | 3 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Giles Moss
Giles Moss is a scholar working on Communication, Public Administration and Marketing, having authored 37 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (15 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (6 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (259 citations), Public Administration (34 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (165 citations). Giles Moss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Coleman, Helen Kennedy, Stephen Coleman, Lee Edwards, Isabelle Schuiling, Bethany Klein, Ben O’Loughlin, David M. Berry, David Lee and Nancy Thumim. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Information Communication & Society and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.