JoAnn DeFiore

436 total citations
10 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

JoAnn DeFiore is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, JoAnn DeFiore has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in JoAnn DeFiore's work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). JoAnn DeFiore is often cited by papers focused on Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). JoAnn DeFiore collaborates with scholars based in United States. JoAnn DeFiore's co-authors include David A. Cotter, Reeve Vanneman, Joan M. Hermsen, Diane Gillespie, Lee Martin and Morten G. Ender and has published in prestigious journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology and Social Science Research.

In The Last Decade

JoAnn DeFiore

9 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
JoAnn DeFiore United States	8	198	150	96	86	44	10	319
Janice Peterson United States	10	134 0.7×	99 0.7×	46 0.5×	74 0.9×	59 1.3×	38	303
Inés Hardoy Norway	12	152 0.8×	116 0.8×	83 0.9×	83 1.0×	116 2.6×	38	339
Melissa S. Herbert United States	6	233 1.2×	249 1.7×	22 0.2×	95 1.1×	49 1.1×	9	413
Chris Middleton United Kingdom	7	149 0.8×	108 0.7×	38 0.4×	33 0.4×	28 0.6×	9	270
Steven Shulman United States	10	155 0.8×	40 0.3×	41 0.4×	95 1.1×	36 0.8×	27	259
Diana M. Pearce United States	8	186 0.9×	70 0.5×	32 0.3×	64 0.7×	73 1.7×	17	290
Νικόλαος Θεοδωρόπουλος Cyprus	9	225 1.1×	93 0.6×	34 0.4×	91 1.1×	61 1.4×	38	347
Catherine Marry France	13	395 2.0×	111 0.7×	38 0.4×	31 0.4×	81 1.8×	46	505
Cristina Bruschini Brazil	8	102 0.5×	114 0.8×	41 0.4×	26 0.3×	32 0.7×	23	258
A. Gündüz-Hosgör Türkiye	7	157 0.8×	138 0.9×	62 0.6×	40 0.5×	21 0.5×	9	316

Countries citing papers authored by JoAnn DeFiore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JoAnn DeFiore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JoAnn DeFiore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JoAnn DeFiore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JoAnn DeFiore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JoAnn DeFiore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JoAnn DeFiore. The network helps show where JoAnn DeFiore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of JoAnn DeFiore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of JoAnn DeFiore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of JoAnn DeFiore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with JoAnn DeFiore. JoAnn DeFiore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

DeFiore, JoAnn. (2010). Women in Contemporary Society. TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology.

2.

Gillespie, Diane, et al.. (2002). White Women Teaching White Women about White Privilege, Race Cognizance and Social Action: Toward a pedagogical pragmatics. Race Ethnicity and Education. 5(3). 237–253. 76 indexed citations

3.

Ender, Morten G., et al.. (2000). Given an Opportunity to Reach out: Heterogeneous Participation in Optional Service-Learning Projects. Teaching Sociology. 28(3). 206–206. 13 indexed citations

4.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1998). The Demand for Female Labor. American Journal of Sociology. 103(6). 1673–1712. 38 indexed citations

5.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1997). All Women Benefit: The Macro-Level Effect of Occupational Integration on Gender Earnings Equality. American Sociological Review. 62(5). 714–714. 96 indexed citations

6.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1997). Service-Learning and Undergraduate Sociology: Syllabi and Instructional Materials. Teaching Sociology. 25(3). 246–246. 16 indexed citations

7.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1997). Same Data, Different Conclusions: Comment on Bernhardt Et Al. American Journal of Sociology. 102(4). 1143–1154. 5 indexed citations

8.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1996). Gender Inequality in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas¹. Rural Sociology. 61(2). 272–288. 18 indexed citations

9.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1995). Occupational Gender Desegregation in the 1980s. Work and Occupations. 22(1). 3–21. 37 indexed citations

10.

Cotter, David A., et al.. (1995). Occupational Gender Segregation and the Earnings Gap: Changes in the 1980s. Social Science Research. 24(4). 439–454. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact