Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

1.6k citations
35 papers · 551 indexed · h-index 16
Topics
Protist diversity and phylogeny (20 papers)Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (6 papers)Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

35 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Joan Smith‐Sonneborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Molecular Biology 338
  • Ecology 127
  • Physiology 111
  • Aging 92
  • Plant Science 57
Replace Rebecca Zabinsky with:
Rebecca Zabinsky United States
William J. Sharrock United States
Eddie E. Deane Hong Kong
Rita Volkers Netherlands
P.H. Krone Canada
Ivan Orlandi Italy
Philip Dammann Germany
Nahoko Higashitani Japan
Dana L. Miller United States
Eve G. Stringham Canada
Joan Smith‐Sonneborn relative to Rebecca Zabinsky United States Rebecca Zabinsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Rebecca Zabinsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Smith‐Sonneborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Smith‐Sonneborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Smith‐Sonneborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Smith‐Sonneborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Smith‐Sonneborn. The network helps show where Joan Smith‐Sonneborn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Smith‐Sonneborn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Smith‐Sonneborn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Smith‐Sonneborn. Joan Smith‐Sonneborn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
delta2 opioid receptor agonist facilitates mean arterial pressure recovery after hemorrhage in conscious rats.
18
3 2
4 27
5 5
6
Novobiocin inhibition of dark repair and longevity in Paramecium.
1
7 7
8 6
9 7
10 16
11 5
12 5
13 61
14 14
15 23
16 6
17 10
18 21
19 52
20 20

About Joan Smith‐Sonneborn

Joan Smith‐Sonneborn is a scholar working on Aging, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protist diversity and phylogeny (20 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (6 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (92 citations), Ecology (127 citations) and Molecular Biology (338 citations). Joan Smith‐Sonneborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Klass, W. Plaut, Julius Marmur, Steve Rodermel, W. J. Van Wagtendonk, G. L. Fisher, C. Russell Middaugh, Carl L. Schildkraut, M. Mandel and Sharon Levisohn. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The Journal of Cell Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026