Joan M. Swearer
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- David A. DrachmanBrian F. O’DonnellAnn L. MitchellCarol F. LippaThomas W. SmithKaren E. PetersonRobert LewHeather J. Barnes
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joan M. Swearer
35 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Psychiatry and Mental health 846
- Physiology 467
- Cognitive Neuroscience 450
- General Health Professions 219
- Clinical Psychology 217
Countries citing papers authored by Joan M. Swearer
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan M. Swearer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan M. Swearer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan M. Swearer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan M. Swearer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan M. Swearer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan M. Swearer. The network helps show where Joan M. Swearer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan M. Swearer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan M. Swearer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan M. Swearer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan M. Swearer. Joan M. Swearer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Predicting aberrant behavior in Alzheimer's disease | 25 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 120 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | Active and passive P3 latency in dementia: Relationship to psychometric, electroencephalographic, and computed tomographic measures | 31 |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 299 |
About Joan M. Swearer
Joan M. Swearer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Decision Sciences and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (846 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (122 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (450 citations). Joan M. Swearer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David A. Drachman, Brian F. O’Donnell, Ann L. Mitchell, Carol F. Lippa, Thomas W. Smith, Karen E. Peterson, Robert Lew, Heather J. Barnes, Robert W. McCarley and Lloyd T. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.