Joan Judge

487 total citations
18 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

Joan Judge is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joan Judge has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Cultural Studies and 3 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Joan Judge's work include Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers), Japanese History and Culture (8 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (3 papers). Joan Judge is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers), Japanese History and Culture (8 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (3 papers). Joan Judge collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Thailand. Joan Judge's co-authors include Xiaobing Tang, Ying Hu, Paul J. Lombroso, Daniel M. Tucker, Laurie Cardona, Robert A. King, Edward L. Snyder, Lawrence David Scahill, Bradley S. Peterson and Abel Bult and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, The American Historical Review and Signs.

In The Last Decade

Joan Judge

16 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Judge

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Judge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Judge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Judge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Judge

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Judge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Judge. The network helps show where Joan Judge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Judge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Judge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Judge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Judge. Joan Judge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Science for the Chinese Common Reader? Myriad Treasures and New Knowledge at the Turn of the Twentieth Century 2017 ·Science in Context ·Joan Judge	1
2	Anne Behnke Kinney : Exemplary Women of Early China: The Lienü Zhuan of Liu Xiang. (Translations from the Asian Classics.) li, 323 pp. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014. £24. ISBN 978 0 231 16309 5. 2016 ·Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies ·Joan Judge	1
3	Sinology, Feminist History, and Everydayness in the Early Republican Periodical Press 2015 ·Signs ·Joan Judge	1
4	Republican Lens 2015 ·Joan Judge	13
5	Chinese Women’s History: Global Circuits, Local meanings 2013 ·Journal of women's history ·Joan Judge	1
6	Beyond Exemplar Tales: Women's Biography in Chinese History 2011 ·eScholarship (California Digital Library) ·Joan Judge, Ying Hu	10
7	From woodblocks to the internet: Chinese publishing and print culture in transition 2011 ·Joan Judge	5
8	A Translocal Technology of the Self: Biographies of World Heroines and the Chinese Woman Question 2009 ·Journal of women's history ·Joan Judge	1
9	The Precious Raft of History 2008 ·Stanford University Press eBooks ·Joan Judge	12
10	Blended Wish Images: Chinese and Western Exemplary Women At The Turn of the Twentieth Century 2004 ·Joan Judge	2
11	Talent, Virtue, and the Nation: Chinese Nationalisms and Female Subjectivities in the Early Twentieth Century 2001 ·The American Historical Review ·Joan Judge	12
12	Talent, Virtue, and the Nation: Chinese Nationalisms and Female Subjectivities in the Early Twentieth Century 2001 ·The American Historical Review ·Joan Judge	15
13	Meng Mu Meets the Modern: Female Exemplars in Early-Twentieth-Century Textbooks for Girls and Women 2000 ·Joan Judge	2
14	Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao 1998 ·The American Historical Review ·Joan Judge, Xiaobing Tang	36
15	Print and Politics: "Shibao" and the Culture of Reform in Late Qing China 1998 ·The American Historical Review ·John Fitzgerald, Joan Judge	1
16	A Putative Poststreptococcal Case of OCD with Chronic Tic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified 1996 ·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry ·Daniel M. Tucker, James F. Leckman, Lawrence David Scahill, (unknown), (unknown), Laurie Cardona, (unknown), (unknown), Jonathan Goldstein, Joan Judge, Edward L. Snyder, Abel Bult, Bradley S. Peterson, Robert A. King, Paul J. Lombroso	49
17	The Factional Function of Print: Liang Qichao, Shibao , and the Fissures in the Late Qing Reform Movement 1995 ·Late imperial China ·Joan Judge	5
18	Public Opinion and the New Politics of Contestation in the Late Qing, 1904-1911 1994 ·Modern China ·Joan Judge	8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact