Joan E. Shook

1.8k citations
25 papers · 596 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joan E. Shook

25 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Joan E. Shook
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Emergency Medicine 351
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 81
  • Emergency Medical Services 98
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 59
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 28
Replace Elaine Gilfoyle with:
Elaine Gilfoyle Canada
Michael T. Meyer United States
Nigel M. Turner Netherlands
Jason Acworth Australia
Kamal Abulebda United States
Ffion Davies United Kingdom
Marilyn C. Morris United States
Patrick Van de Voorde Belgium
Patrick Mahar Australia
Debra O’Brien Australia
Joan E. Shook relative to Elaine Gilfoyle Canada Elaine Gilfoyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elaine Gilfoyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. Shook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. Shook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. Shook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. Shook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. Shook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. Shook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. Shook. The network helps show where Joan E. Shook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan E. Shook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan E. Shook Line = papers co-authored together Joan E. Shook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999236
2 201495
3 201564
4 200935
5 200032
6 200226
7 199625
8 200715
9 202111
10 201511
11 20149
12 20218
13 20037
14 19975
15 19964
16 19983
17 20072
18 20231
19 20081
20 19981

About Joan E. Shook

Joan E. Shook is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 25 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (351 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (81 citations), Emergency Medical Services (98 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (59 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (28 citations). Joan E. Shook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Sirbaugh, Mark Ward, Paul E. Pepe, Kay T. Kimball, Mitchell J. Goldman, Brian R. Moore, Nanette C. Dudley, Susan Fuchs, Natalie Lane and Thomas H. Chun. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Emergency Care, Annals of Emergency Medicine, PEDIATRICS, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Emergency Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact