Edward M. Reece
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Dermatology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Co-authors
- Rod J. RohrichSebastian WinocourJeffrey E. JanisAmjed Abu‐GhnameDaniel A. HatefJoel E. PessaMatthew J. DavisJoshua Vorstenbosch
- Topics
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (25 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (24 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaDiabetes CareSpine
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaCyprus
In The Last Decade
Edward M. Reece
116 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Surgery 838
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 348
- Dermatology 259
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
- Rehabilitation 234
Countries citing papers authored by Edward M. Reece
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward M. Reece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward M. Reece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward M. Reece more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward M. Reece
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward M. Reece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward M. Reece. The network helps show where Edward M. Reece may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward M. Reece
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward M. Reece. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward M. Reece based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward M. Reece. Edward M. Reece is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 97 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Edward M. Reece
Edward M. Reece is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 123 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (25 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (24 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (234 citations), Dermatology (259 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (348 citations). Edward M. Reece has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Rod J. Rohrich, Sebastian Winocour, Jeffrey E. Janis, Amjed Abu‐Ghname, Daniel A. Hatef, Joel E. Pessa, Matthew J. Davis, Joshua Vorstenbosch, Bahman Guyuron and Edward P. Buchanan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Diabetes Care and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.