Joan C. Beal
- Linguistics and Language top 1%
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Carmen LlamasKaren P. CorriganHermann MoislAnne‐Marie Simon‐VandenbergenShirley Brice HeathCharles A. FergusonWilliam A. KretzschmarCharles Barber
- Topics
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology (26 papers)Lexicography and Language Studies (19 papers)Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaLanguage in SocietyThe Modern Language Review
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainItaly
In The Last Decade
Joan C. Beal
42 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Linguistics and Language 340
- Language and Linguistics 300
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
- Literature and Literary Theory 34
- Gender Studies 33
Countries citing papers authored by Joan C. Beal
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan C. Beal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan C. Beal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan C. Beal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan C. Beal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan C. Beal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan C. Beal. The network helps show where Joan C. Beal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan C. Beal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan C. Beal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan C. Beal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan C. Beal. Joan C. Beal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Cut from the same CLOTH? Variation and change in the CLOTH lexical set | 4 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | Perspectives on prescriptivism | 13 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Lengthening of a in Tyneside English | 2 |
About Joan C. Beal
Joan C. Beal is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (26 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (19 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (340 citations), Language and Linguistics (300 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations). Joan C. Beal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Carmen Llamas, Karen P. Corrigan, Hermann Moisl, Anne‐Marie Simon‐Vandenbergen, Shirley Brice Heath, Charles A. Ferguson, William A. Kretzschmar, Charles Barber, Philip Shaw and Jane Hodson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Language in Society and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.