Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology
This map shows the geographic impact of Joakim Ekman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joakim Ekman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joakim Ekman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joakim Ekman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joakim Ekman. The network helps show where Joakim Ekman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joakim Ekman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joakim Ekman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joakim Ekman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joakim Ekman. Joakim Ekman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ekman, Joakim, Pär Zetterberg, Mikael Persson, & Klas Andersson. (2014). Hur påverkar reformer av samhällskunskap ungas medborgarkompetens. 116(2). 233–234.
7.
Ekman, Joakim. (2013). Schools, Democratic Socialization and Political Participation : Political Activity and Passivity among Swedish Youths. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.5 indexed citations
8.
Amnå, Erik & Joakim Ekman. (2013). Unga politiskt intresserade engageras inte av partierna. Örebro University Library (Örebro University).1 indexed citations
9.
Ekman, Joakim. (2010). [Avhandlingsanmälan av] Broman, Anders, 2009. Att göra en demokrat? Demokratisk socialisation i den svenska gymnasieskolan : Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies 2009: 41. 112(1). 122–128.4 indexed citations
10.
Amnå, Erik, et al.. (2010). Skolornas institutionella karaktär och elevernas medborgarkompetens: en jämförelse av olika kommunala och fristående skolor över tid och rum. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 112(1). 23–32.4 indexed citations
11.
Linde, Jonas & Joakim Ekman. (2010). Patterns of Stability and Performance in Post- Communist Hybrid Regimes.1 indexed citations
Ekman, Joakim. (2009). Euroskepticism bland partier och medborgare: Tidigare forskning, förklaringar och förslag på analysmodeller. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift. 111(2). 135–166.
Ekman, Joakim, Jonas Linde, & Thomas Sedelius. (2007). Hybridregimer : förändrade förutsättningar för demokrati och demokratibistånd. 109(2). 133–137.
17.
Berglund, Sten, Jonas Linde, & Joakim Ekman. (2004). An assessment of support for democracy in the new EU member states. 268.2 indexed citations
18.
Berglund, Sten, et al.. (2004). The challenge of history in Central and Eastern Europe. 13–56.2 indexed citations
19.
Linde, Jonas & Joakim Ekman. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research. 42(3). 391–408.357 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Linde, Jonas & Joakim Ekman. (2002). Communist Nostalgia in Central and Eastern Europe : A Matter of Principles or Performance?.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.