Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Selective laser melting of iron-based powder
20041.3k citationsJ.-P. Kruth, Ludo Froyen et al.Journal of Materials Processing Technologyprofile →
Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
20051.0k citationsJean‐Pierre Kruth, Peter Mercelis et al.Rapid Prototyping Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Van Vaerenbergh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Van Vaerenbergh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Van Vaerenbergh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Van Vaerenbergh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Van Vaerenbergh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Van Vaerenbergh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Van Vaerenbergh. The network helps show where Jo Van Vaerenbergh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Van Vaerenbergh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Van Vaerenbergh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Van Vaerenbergh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Van Vaerenbergh. Jo Van Vaerenbergh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mercelis, Peter, J.-P. Kruth, & Jo Van Vaerenbergh. (2007). Feedback control of selective laser melting (on cd-rom). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–6.2 indexed citations
8.
Dijck, Gert Van, Jo Van Vaerenbergh, & Marc M. Van Hulle. (2007). Posterior probability profiles for the automated assessment of the recovery of stroke patients. Lirias (KU Leuven). 347–353.6 indexed citations
Kruth, J.-P., Antonio Domenico Ludovico, Sabina Luisa Campanelli, Marleen Rombouts, & Jo Van Vaerenbergh. (2004). Statistical optimisation of selective laser sintering of metal powders. University of Twente Research Information. 643–647.1 indexed citations
16.
Vaerenbergh, Jo Van. (2004). Process optimization in selective laser melting. University of Twente Research Information.3 indexed citations
17.
Kruth, J.-P., Ludo Froyen, Jo Van Vaerenbergh, et al.. (2004). Selective laser melting of iron-based powder. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 149(1-3). 616–622.1269 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Kruth, J.-P., Peter Mercelis, Jo Van Vaerenbergh, Ludo Froyen, & Marleen Rombouts. (2003). ADVANCES IN SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING. Lirias (KU Leuven). 38–49.15 indexed citations
Vaerenbergh, Jo Van & Paul Broos. (1990). [Positive Romberg test and the probability of falls in the aged].. PubMed. 21(2). 71–4.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.