Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Selective laser melting of iron-based powder
20041.3k citationsJ.-P. Kruth, Ludo Froyen et al.Journal of Materials Processing Technologyprofile →
Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing
20071.1k citationsJ.-P. Kruth et al.CIRP Annalsprofile →
Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping
1998998 citationsJ.-P. Kruth et al.CIRP Annalsprofile →
Microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel β titanium metallic composite by selective laser melting
2014454 citationsBey Vrancken, Lore Thijs et al.Acta Materialiaprofile →
In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system
2014360 citationsStijn Clijsters, Tom Craeghs et al.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J.-P. Kruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.-P. Kruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.-P. Kruth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.-P. Kruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.-P. Kruth. The network helps show where J.-P. Kruth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.-P. Kruth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.-P. Kruth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.-P. Kruth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.-P. Kruth. J.-P. Kruth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vrancken, Bey, Lore Thijs, J.-P. Kruth, & J. Van Humbeeck. (2014). Microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel β titanium metallic composite by selective laser melting. Acta Materialia. 68. 150–158.454 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Clijsters, Stijn, Tom Craeghs, Sam Buls, Karolien Kempen, & J.-P. Kruth. (2014). In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 75(5-8). 1089–1101.360 indexed citations breakdown →
Mercelis, Peter, J.-P. Kruth, & Jo Van Vaerenbergh. (2007). Feedback control of selective laser melting (on cd-rom). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–6.2 indexed citations
Kruth, J.-P., Ludo Froyen, Jo Van Vaerenbergh, et al.. (2004). Selective laser melting of iron-based powder. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 149(1-3). 616–622.1269 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Kruth, J.-P., Antonio Domenico Ludovico, Sabina Luisa Campanelli, Marleen Rombouts, & Jo Van Vaerenbergh. (2004). Statistical optimisation of selective laser sintering of metal powders. University of Twente Research Information. 643–647.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.