Jo Smith

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jo Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Forestry 455
  • Horticulture 26
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 257
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 348
  • Soil Science 163
Replace Zoraida Calle with:
Zoraida Calle Colombia
Peter Mwangi Kenya
Anastasia Pantera Greece
Enrique Murgueitio Colombia
Alain Olivier Canada
David Rivest Canada
Daniel Luís Mascia Vieira Brazil
Julian Chará Colombia
Lindsey Norgrove Switzerland
A. M. N. Izac Australia
Jo Smith relative to Zoraida Calle Colombia Zoraida Calle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Zoraida Calle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Smith. The network helps show where Jo Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jo Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012190
2 200786
3 200981
4 201278
5 201773
6 202057
7 202055
8 200851
9 201539
10 200635
11 201932
12 202232
13 201832
14 200832
15 201330
16 202129
17 202223
18 202119
19 202118
20 202016

About Jo Smith

Jo Smith is a scholar working on Forestry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (21 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (7 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (455 citations), Horticulture (26 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (257 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (348 citations) and Soil Science (163 citations). Jo Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Pearce, Martin S. Wolfe, Paul Eggleton, Simon G. Potts, Robbie D. Girling, Richard J. Walters, Ben A. Woodcock, Hannah Jones, Laurence Smith and David T. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Agroforestry Systems, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Agricultural Systems and Agronomy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact