This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce Pearce more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce Pearce. The network helps show where Bruce Pearce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce Pearce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce Pearce.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce Pearce based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce Pearce. Bruce Pearce is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lampkin, Nicolas, Shailesh Shrestha, David Baldock, et al.. (2021). Preparing the Evidence Base for Post-Brexit agriculture in Scotland – case studies on alternative payments.1 indexed citations
Padel, Susanne, et al.. (2018). Transitions to Agroecological Systems: Farmers’ Experience. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).2 indexed citations
Smith, Jo, Robbie D. Girling, Martin S. Wolfe, & Bruce Pearce. (2014). Agroforestry: integrating apple and arable production as an approach to reducing copper use in organic and low-input apple production. CentAUR (University of Reading).3 indexed citations
9.
MacMillan, Tom & Bruce Pearce. (2014). Duchy Originals Future Farming Programme – A practical, farmer led approach to innovation. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).2 indexed citations
10.
Gerrard, Catherine L, et al.. (2014). 100% Organic Feed for Poultry – Results of Feed Trials in the UK. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).1 indexed citations
Döring, Thomas, et al.. (2013). COBRA: a new European research project for organic plant breeding. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).1 indexed citations
14.
Lillywhite, Robert, Paul Courtney, Nicolas Lampkin, et al.. (2012). Assessing the economic, environmental and social characteristics of UK farming systems..5 indexed citations
Gerrard, Catherine L, et al.. (2011). OCIS Public Goods Tool Development. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).9 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Laurence, Susanne Padel, Bruce Pearce, et al.. (2011). Assessing the public goods provided by organic agriculture: lessons learned from practice. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).2 indexed citations
18.
Padel, Susanne, U. Niggli, Bruce Pearce, et al.. (2010). Technology Platform «Organics».4 indexed citations
19.
Jones, Hannah, Sarah Clarke, Bruce Pearce, et al.. (2006). A participatory methodology for large scale field trials in the UK. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).2 indexed citations
20.
Atkinson, David, Christine Watson, Bruce Pearce, et al.. (2002). Organic agriculture and GM crops.. 523–530.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.