Jo Ingold

605 total citations
30 papers, 333 citations indexed

About

Jo Ingold is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Ingold has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 333 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 9 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Jo Ingold's work include Employment and Welfare Studies (19 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers). Jo Ingold is often cited by papers focused on Employment and Welfare Studies (19 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers). Jo Ingold collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Jo Ingold's co-authors include Mark Stuart, Mark Monaghan, David Etherington, Danat Valizade, D. Robertshaw, Kate Summers, Daniel Edmiston, Ben Baumberg Geiger, Lisa Scullion and David F. Young and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Relations, Public Administration and Human Resource Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

Jo Ingold

25 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo Ingold United Kingdom 10 177 155 102 86 63 30 333
Mattias Bengtsson Sweden 8 132 0.7× 164 1.1× 79 0.8× 85 1.0× 21 0.3× 29 280
Yeun‐wen Ku Taiwan 11 101 0.6× 250 1.6× 56 0.5× 180 2.1× 41 0.7× 23 362
Einat Lavee Israel 13 98 0.6× 126 0.8× 176 1.7× 204 2.4× 35 0.6× 29 445
Irene Dingeldey Germany 9 162 0.9× 242 1.6× 71 0.7× 128 1.5× 28 0.4× 28 351
Paul de Beer Netherlands 11 88 0.5× 120 0.8× 36 0.4× 116 1.3× 29 0.5× 28 293
Susan Corby United Kingdom 12 110 0.6× 87 0.6× 122 1.2× 91 1.1× 55 0.9× 44 362
Shannon R. Lane United States 14 201 1.1× 70 0.5× 259 2.5× 124 1.4× 81 1.3× 38 465
Antonio Martín Artiles Spain 11 156 0.9× 224 1.4× 130 1.3× 167 1.9× 43 0.7× 41 444
Adam Mrozowicki Poland 13 126 0.7× 159 1.0× 124 1.2× 151 1.8× 21 0.3× 53 368
David Etherington United Kingdom 11 128 0.7× 227 1.5× 54 0.5× 98 1.1× 50 0.8× 40 421

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Ingold

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Ingold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Ingold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Ingold more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Ingold

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Ingold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Ingold. The network helps show where Jo Ingold may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Ingold

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Ingold. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Ingold based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Ingold. Jo Ingold is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ingold, Jo, Chris Forde, & D. Robertshaw. (2024). Varieties of digitalisation? A comparison of employment services digitalisation in the UK and Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 60(2). 384–400.
2.
3.
Tomlinson, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Old norms in the new normal: Exploring and resisting the rise of the ideal pandemic worker. Gender Work and Organization. 31(2). 594–605.
4.
Vries, Robert de, Ben Baumberg Geiger, Lisa Scullion, et al.. (2023). Welfare attitudes in a crisis: How COVID exceptionalism undermined greater solidarity. Journal of Social Policy. 1–20. 1 indexed citations
5.
Edmiston, Daniel, D. Robertshaw, David F. Young, et al.. (2022). Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security. Social Policy and Administration. 56(5). 775–790. 15 indexed citations
7.
Vries, Rory D. de, Ben Baumberg Geiger, Kate Summers, et al.. (2021). Solidarity in a crisis? Trends in attitudes to benefits during COVID-19. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 8 indexed citations
8.
Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Daniel Edmiston, Kate Summers, et al.. (2021). Hunger and the welfare state : food insecurity among benefit claimants in the UK. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 4 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, Paul, et al.. (2021). Class Composition, Labour's Strategy and the Politics of Work. The Political Quarterly. 93(1). 142–149. 4 indexed citations
10.
Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Kate Summers, Daniel Edmiston, et al.. (2021). Non-take-up of benefits at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 4 indexed citations
11.
Edmiston, Daniel, Rory D. de Vries, Kate Summers, et al.. (2020). Who are the new COVID-19 cohort of benefit claimants? : Welfare at a (Social) Distance Rapid Report #2. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 1 indexed citations
12.
Edmiston, Daniel, Rory D. de Vries, Kate Summers, et al.. (2020). Who are the new COVID-19 cohort of benefit claimants?. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
13.
Scullion, Lisa, Kate Summers, Pierre Martin, et al.. (2020). At the edge of the safety net: Unsuccessful benefits claims at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
14.
Ingold, Jo, et al.. (2020). Activating the ‘ideal jobseeker’: Experiences of individuals with mental health conditions on the UK Work Programme. Human Relations. 74(10). 1604–1627. 28 indexed citations
15.
Karagiannaki, Eleni, et al.. (2020). Claiming but connected to work : Welfare at a (Social) Distance Rapid Report #1. 1 indexed citations
16.
Ingold, Jo & Mark Monaghan. (2016). Evidence translation: an exploration of policy makers’ use of evidence. Policy & Politics. 44(2). 171–190. 36 indexed citations
17.
Ingold, Jo & Mark Stuart. (2014). Employer Engagement in the Work Programme. Own your potential (DEAKIN). 1 indexed citations
18.
Ingold, Jo & Mark Stuart. (2014). The Demand-Side of Active Labour Market Policies: A Regional Study of Employer Engagement in the Work Programme. Journal of Social Policy. 44(3). 443–462. 66 indexed citations
19.
Ingold, Jo & David Etherington. (2013). Work, welfare and gender inequalities: an analysis of activation strategies for partnered women in the UK, Australia and Denmark. Work Employment and Society. 27(4). 621–638. 22 indexed citations
20.
Etherington, David & Jo Ingold. (2012). Welfare to work and the inclusive labour market: a comparative study of activation policies for disability and long-term sickness benefit claimants in the UK and Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy. 22(1). 30–44. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026