Jin‐ichi Itoh

664 citations
42 papers · 268 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jin‐ichi Itoh

38 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Jin‐ichi Itoh
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 66
  • Applied Mathematics 153
  • Geometry and Topology 120
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
  • Mathematical Physics 41
Replace Ronaldo Garcia with:
Ronaldo Garcia Brazil
Marek Lassak Poland
Philip L. Bowers United States
Soley Ersoy Türkiye
Manfredo P. do Carmo Brazil
Endre Makai Hungary
Nobuko Takeuchi Japan
Boris Odehnal Austria
Vladislav V. Goldberg United States
Burt Rodin United States
Jin‐ichi Itoh relative to Ronaldo Garcia Brazil Ronaldo Garcia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ronaldo Garcia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jin‐ichi Itoh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jin‐ichi Itoh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin‐ichi Itoh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin‐ichi Itoh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jin‐ichi Itoh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin‐ichi Itoh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin‐ichi Itoh. The network helps show where Jin‐ichi Itoh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jin‐ichi Itoh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jin‐ichi Itoh Line = papers co-authored together Jin‐ichi Itoh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200070
2 200431
3 199819
4 199617
5 200614
6 200414
7 200412
8 200412
9 20057
10 20147
11 20076
12 20086
13 20095
14 20115
15
Estimation of the necessary number of points in Riemannian Voronoi.
20033
16 20153
17 20043
18 20113
19 20043
20 20152

About Jin‐ichi Itoh

Jin‐ichi Itoh is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (19 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (15 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (11 papers), Mathematics and Applications (10 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (9 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (9 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (8 papers) and 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (66 citations), Applied Mathematics (153 citations), Geometry and Topology (120 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Mathematical Physics (41 citations). Jin‐ichi Itoh has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Romania and United States. Frequent co-authors include Minoru Tanaka, Tudor Zamfirescu, Robert Sinclair, Takashi Sakai, Joseph O’Rourke, K. Onishi, Martin L. Demaine, Erik D. Demaine, Anna Lubiw and Imre Bárány. Their work appears in journals such as Results in Mathematics, European Journal of Combinatorics, Computational Geometry, Discrete & Computational Geometry and manuscripta mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact