Jim Stone

821 citations
37 papers · 417 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Stone

33 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Jim Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Philosophy 195
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
Replace David B. Hershenov with:
David B. Hershenov United States
Hallvard Lillehammer United Kingdom
Caspar Hare United States
Sharon Street United States
Bruce N. Waller United States
Chris Heathwood United States
Saul Smilansky Israel
James Andow United Kingdom
Jens Johansson Sweden
Melinda A. Roberts United States
Jim Stone relative to David B. Hershenov United States David B. Hershenov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David B. Hershenov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Stone. The network helps show where Jim Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jim Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Stone Line = papers co-authored together Jim Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000169
2 198758
3 199740
4 200718
5 199416
6 199413
7 198811
8 200510
9 20059
10 20038
11 19988
12 20007
13 19846
14 19915
15 19814
16 20014
17 20134
18 20013
19 20252
20
Debunking the Myths. Research Offers Ammunition to Fight Misperceptions of Voc Ed.
19932

About Jim Stone

Jim Stone is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 37 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (195 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (30 citations). Jim Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric T. Olson, Bradford L. Currier, Kai‐Nan An, KAREN E. WARDEN, Bernard H. Baumrin, Fredric A. Gorin, Jason S. Eldrige, Michael Hogarth, Alan Soble and Jonathan Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Religious Studies and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact