Mark Coleman

3.1k total citations
73 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Mark Coleman is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Coleman has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Surgery, 30 papers in Oncology and 22 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark Coleman's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (25 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (22 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (18 papers). Mark Coleman is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (25 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (22 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (18 papers). Mark Coleman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Mark Coleman's co-authors include George B. Hanna, Brendan Moran, Alexander D McLain, Danilo Mišković, Robin H. Kennedy, Susannah M. Wyles, Melody Ni, George Fielding, Ronan A. Cahill and Valerio Celentano and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mark Coleman

69 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Coleman United Kingdom 22 1.1k 653 358 208 201 73 1.6k
Jason Gurney New Zealand 22 495 0.4× 440 0.7× 90 0.3× 319 1.5× 182 0.9× 104 1.8k
Sharon L. Stein United States 28 1.2k 1.0× 763 1.2× 333 0.9× 262 1.3× 254 1.3× 126 1.9k
Jennifer S. Davids United States 23 606 0.5× 397 0.6× 185 0.5× 201 1.0× 139 0.7× 92 1.4k
Bharti Khurana United States 27 1.4k 1.2× 144 0.2× 69 0.2× 169 0.8× 263 1.3× 131 2.5k
Natalie Blencowe United Kingdom 21 964 0.9× 231 0.4× 263 0.7× 334 1.6× 393 2.0× 121 1.7k
Douglas M. Bowley United Kingdom 23 968 0.9× 259 0.4× 120 0.3× 140 0.7× 269 1.3× 123 1.7k
Eric M. Haas United States 26 1.6k 1.4× 1.1k 1.6× 249 0.7× 37 0.2× 342 1.7× 89 2.3k
Panagiotis Dedeilias Greece 14 389 0.3× 172 0.3× 262 0.7× 221 1.1× 273 1.4× 68 1.0k
Brandon W. Propper United States 15 436 0.4× 159 0.2× 120 0.3× 171 0.8× 385 1.9× 56 1.5k
Rubén Mújica-Mota United Kingdom 19 719 0.6× 102 0.2× 127 0.4× 130 0.6× 94 0.5× 54 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Coleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Coleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Coleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Coleman. The network helps show where Mark Coleman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Coleman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Coleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Coleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Coleman. Mark Coleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Collins, Justin, Nader Francis, Fares S. Haddad, et al.. (2025). Digital transformation of robotic surgery train the trainer ‘TTT’ courses: training the trainer in technique and technology (the 4Ts course). Journal of Robotic Surgery. 19(1). 510–510.
2.
Obermair, Andreas, George B. Hanna, Nicholas Graves, et al.. (2023). Experience of practicing obstetrician-gynecologists in a surgical training program in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. AJOG Global Reports. 3(3). 100249–100249. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ravindran, Srivathsan, Chris Healey, Hutan Ashrafian, et al.. (2022). P196 The national census of UK endoscopy services 2021. Poster presentations. A136.1–A136. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ravindran, Srivathsan, Chris Healey, Sarah C. Marshall, et al.. (2021). PTU-19 The endoscopy safety attitudes questionnaire (ENDO-SAQ): Results of a pilot study. A51.1–A51.
5.
6.
Ravindran, Srivathsan, Siwan Thomas‐Gibson, Raphael Broughton, Mark Coleman, & Geoff Smith. (2021). P404 JAG core endoscopy programme: a descriptive study of e-learning engagement. A249.1–A249. 1 indexed citations
7.
Coleman, Mark, et al.. (2020). The use of Endo-SPONGE® in rectal anastomotic leaks: a systematic review. Techniques in Coloproctology. 24(7). 685–694. 12 indexed citations
8.
9.
Celentano, Valerio, Neil Smart, John McGrath, et al.. (2020). How to report educational videos in robotic surgery: an international multidisciplinary consensus statement. Updates in Surgery. 73(3). 815–821. 16 indexed citations
10.
Ravindran, Srivathsan, Paul Bassett, Raphael Broughton, et al.. (2020). National census of UK endoscopy services in 2019. Frontline Gastroenterology. 12(6). 451–460. 53 indexed citations
11.
Panahi, Pedram, et al.. (2020). Early versus interval appendicectomy for localised perforated appendicitis in children: A best evidence review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 59. 161–164. 1 indexed citations
12.
Obermair, Andreas, Nigel R Armfield, Nicholas Graves, et al.. (2019). How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial. BMJ Open. 9(5). e027155–e027155. 12 indexed citations
13.
Labib, Peter, et al.. (2019). Long-term results after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(1). 170–176. 8 indexed citations
14.
Celentano, Valerio, Neil Smart, Ronan A. Cahill, et al.. (2018). Use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom. The Surgeon. 17(6). 334–339. 57 indexed citations
15.
Evans, M. D., et al.. (2018). Chemotherapeutic Response and Survival for Patients With an Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Low Hemoglobin Levels. Annals of Coloproctology. 34(6). 312–316. 1 indexed citations
16.
Ni, Melody, Hugh Mackenzie, Adam L. Widdison, et al.. (2015). What errors make a laparoscopic cancer surgery unsafe? An ad hoc analysis of competency assessment in the National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(3). 1020–1027. 9 indexed citations
17.
Wyles, Susannah M., Danilo Mišković, Melody Ni, et al.. (2012). ‘Trainee’ evaluation of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Disease. 14(6). e352–7. 10 indexed citations
18.
Beckly, John, et al.. (2007). Artificial Bowel Markers: A Novel Method for Measuring the Accuracy of Colonoscopy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 50(7). 1047–1052. 1 indexed citations
19.
Grenyer, Brin F. S., et al.. (2004). Safer at work: development and evaluation of an aggression and violence minimization program. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 38(10). 804–810. 5 indexed citations
20.
Allen, Jeff W., Mark Coleman, & George Fielding. (2001). Lessons learned from laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity. The American Journal of Surgery. 182(1). 10–14. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason Gurney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sharon L. Stein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer S. Davids Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bharti Khurana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalie Blencowe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Douglas M. Bowley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eric M. Haas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Panagiotis Dedeilias Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brandon W. Propper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rubén Mújica-Mota
Rankless by CCL
2026