Jill S. Greenlee

758 total citations
19 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Jill S. Greenlee is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Jill S. Greenlee has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Gender Studies, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Jill S. Greenlee's work include Gender Politics and Representation (14 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers). Jill S. Greenlee is often cited by papers focused on Gender Politics and Representation (14 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers). Jill S. Greenlee collaborates with scholars based in United States and Nigeria. Jill S. Greenlee's co-authors include Mirya R. Holman, Zoe M. Oxley, Angela L. Bos, J. Celeste Lay, Tatishe Nteta, Jesse H. Rhodes, Grace Deason, Carrie A. Langner, Mia Costa and Jennifer L. Merolla and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, Public Opinion Quarterly and Political Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jill S. Greenlee

16 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jill S. Greenlee United States	12	241	158	134	38	22	19	346
Shan‐Jan Sarah Liu United Kingdom	10	151 0.6×	80 0.5×	84 0.6×	25 0.7×	11 0.5×	20	244
Sophia J. Wallace United States	11	127 0.5×	240 1.5×	274 2.0×	91 2.4×	18 0.8×	20	399
Shayla C. Nunnally United States	8	71 0.3×	156 1.0×	317 2.4×	41 1.1×	19 0.9×	16	388
Niambi M. Carter United States	8	81 0.3×	153 1.0×	330 2.5×	29 0.8×	18 0.8×	14	377
Reuel R. Rogers United States	6	61 0.3×	154 1.0×	258 1.9×	42 1.1×	15 0.7×	10	313
Lisa Harrison United Kingdom	6	99 0.4×	77 0.5×	120 0.9×	38 1.0×	33 1.5×	24	219
Christopher D. DeSante United States	6	70 0.3×	130 0.8×	189 1.4×	23 0.6×	12 0.5×	9	275
Monique L. Lyle United States	5	50 0.2×	102 0.6×	233 1.7×	25 0.7×	15 0.7×	8	272
Jason P. Casellas United States	8	197 0.8×	253 1.6×	165 1.2×	39 1.0×	11 0.5×	18	321
Chris Zepeda‐Millán United States	10	47 0.2×	173 1.1×	268 2.0×	92 2.4×	16 0.7×	14	333

Countries citing papers authored by Jill S. Greenlee

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill S. Greenlee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill S. Greenlee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill S. Greenlee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill S. Greenlee

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill S. Greenlee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill S. Greenlee. The network helps show where Jill S. Greenlee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill S. Greenlee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill S. Greenlee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill S. Greenlee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill S. Greenlee. Jill S. Greenlee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Kang, Alice J., et al.. (2025). Gendered perceptions of leadership and children’s political ambition: evidence from Nigeria. Politics Groups and Identities. 1–10.

Merolla, Jennifer L., et al.. (2023). Who Cares About Caregiving?: Identity and Caregiving Policy Perspectives. The Forum. 21(3). 411–429. 1 indexed citations

Lay, J. Celeste, Mirya R. Holman, Jill S. Greenlee, Zoe M. Oxley, & Angela L. Bos. (2022). Partisanship on the Playground: Expressive Party Politics Among Children. Political Research Quarterly. 76(3). 1249–1264. 9 indexed citations

Bos, Angela L., Jill S. Greenlee, Mirya R. Holman, Zoe M. Oxley, & J. Celeste Lay. (2021). This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest. American Political Science Review. 116(2). 484–501. 80 indexed citations

Bos, Angela L., Mirya R. Holman, Jill S. Greenlee, Zoe M. Oxley, & J. Celeste Lay. (2020). 100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics. PS Political Science & Politics. 53(3). 474–478. 10 indexed citations

Oxley, Zoe M., Mirya R. Holman, Jill S. Greenlee, Angela L. Bos, & J. Celeste Lay. (2020). Children’s Views of the American Presidency. Public Opinion Quarterly. 84(1). 141–157. 11 indexed citations

Rhodes, Jesse H., et al.. (2020). Just Locker Room Talk? Explicit Sexism and the Impact of the Access Hollywood Tape on Electoral Support for Donald Trump in 2016. Political Communication. 37(6). 741–767. 12 indexed citations

Costa, Mia, et al.. (2019). Family Ties? The Limits of Fathering Daughters on Congressional Behavior. American Politics Research. 47(3). 471–493. 7 indexed citations

Lay, J. Celeste, et al.. (2019). TIME for Kids to Learn Gender Stereotypes: Analysis of Gender and Political Leadership in a Common Social Studies Resource for Children. Politics & Gender. 17(1). 1–22. 18 indexed citations

10.

Costa, Mia, et al.. (2019). Family Ties? The Limits of Fathering Daughters on Congressional Behavior. American Politics Research. 47(3). 471–493.

11.

Rhodes, Jesse H., et al.. (2018). The First-Daughter Effect. Public Opinion Quarterly. 82(3). 493–523. 30 indexed citations

12.

Greenlee, Jill S., et al.. (2018). Helping to Break the Glass Ceiling? Fathers, First Daughters, and Presidential Vote Choice in 2016. Political Behavior. 42(3). 655–695. 11 indexed citations

13.

Deason, Grace, Jill S. Greenlee, & Carrie A. Langner. (2014). Mothers on the campaign trail: implications of Politicized Motherhood for women in politics. Politics Groups and Identities. 3(1). 133–148. 42 indexed citations

14.

Greenlee, Jill S., et al.. (2014). Making it Personal: Assessing the Impact of In-Class Exercises on Closing the Gender Gap in Political Ambition. Journal of Political Science Education. 10(1). 48–61. 14 indexed citations

15.

Greenlee, Jill S.. (2014). The Political Consequences of Motherhood. University of Michigan Press eBooks. 52 indexed citations

16.

Nteta, Tatishe & Jill S. Greenlee. (2013). A Change is Gonna Come: Generational Membership and White Racial Attitudes in the 21^stCentury. Political Psychology. 34(6). 877–897. 17 indexed citations

17.

Schneider, Monica C., et al.. (2012). Data, Methods, and Theoretical Implications. PS Political Science & Politics. 45(2). 232–237. 1 indexed citations

18.

Greenlee, Jill S.. (2010). Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms and the Question of “Transformative” Motherhood. Politics & Gender. 6(3). 405–431. 18 indexed citations

19.

Greenlee, Jill S., et al.. (2001). Family caregivers in California: Needs, interventions and model programs. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact