Jiling Cao

51 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Jiling Cao
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Geometry and Topology 116
  • Finance 77
  • Management Science and Operations Research 89
  • Mathematical Physics 62
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 99
Replace Thomas E. Armstrong with:
Thomas E. Armstrong United States
Christian Hess France
Carlos Hervés‐Beloso Spain
Gerhard Herden Germany
Foivos Xanthos Canada
Franz Pauer Austria
Yi Fang China
Hong-Quan Li China
Douglas N. Hoover United States
Baojun Bian China
Jiling Cao relative to Thomas E. Armstrong United States Thomas E. Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Thomas E. Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jiling Cao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jiling Cao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jiling Cao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jiling Cao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jiling Cao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jiling Cao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jiling Cao. The network helps show where Jiling Cao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jiling Cao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jiling Cao Line = papers co-authored together Jiling Cao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202020
2 201618
3
A survey on topological games and their applications in analysis
200617
4 200217
5
SUBMAXIMALITY, EXTREMAL DISCONNECTEDNESS AND GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS
199816
6 200612
7 202011
8 201210
9 20129
10 20208
11 20058
12 19988
13 20128
14 20058
15 20208
16 20137
17
Two Variations of the Choquet Game
20046
18 20066
19 20196
20 20016

About Jiling Cao

Jiling Cao is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Finance, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 58 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (26 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (14 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (13 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (11 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (7 papers) and Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (116 citations), Finance (77 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (89 citations), Mathematical Physics (62 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (99 citations). Jiling Cao has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ivan L. Reilly, Warren B. Moors, Maximilian Ganster, Xinfeng Ruan, Artur Hideyuki Tomita, Guanghua Lian, Jeong‐Hoon Kim, Salvador Romaguera, Heikki J. K. Junnila and Zbigniew Piotrowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Economics, Journal of Futures Markets, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Topology and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact