Journal of Futures Markets

2.4k papers and 45.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Journal of Futures Markets in the last decades have received a total of 45.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Futures Markets usually cover Finance (2.0k papers), Economics and Econometrics (1.6k papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (550 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1.3k papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (1.2k papers) and Stochastic processes and financial applications (775 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Futures Markets are Donald Lien, Yiuman Tse, Franklin R. Edwards, Robert E. Whaley, Doojin Ryu, Bradford Cornell, Hans R. Stoll, Jin E. Zhang, Ronald W. Masulis and Roger D. Huang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Futures Markets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Futures Markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Futures Markets.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Futures Markets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Futures Markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Futures Markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Futures Markets more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025