J.H. Bower

457 total citations
10 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

J.H. Bower is a scholar working on Plant Science, Mechanics of Materials and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.H. Bower has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Plant Science, 2 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 2 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in J.H. Bower's work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (8 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). J.H. Bower is often cited by papers focused on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (8 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). J.H. Bower collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. J.H. Bower's co-authors include Elizabeth Mitcham, William V. Biasi, Jeff Johnson, Juming Tang, Ralph P. Cavalieri, S Wang, James D. Hansen, Brian D. Patterson, Alain Lachaux and Paul Holford and has published in prestigious journals such as Postharvest Biology and Technology, Packaging Technology and Science and Acta Horticulturae.

In The Last Decade

J.H. Bower

9 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J.H. Bower Australia 7 277 60 55 27 27 10 322
Yair Aharoni Israel 12 280 1.0× 58 1.0× 55 1.0× 31 1.1× 9 0.3× 21 327
M. Sisquella Spain 8 272 1.0× 93 1.6× 19 0.3× 35 1.3× 42 1.6× 10 339
O. Adeyeye United States 4 245 0.9× 52 0.9× 12 0.2× 15 0.6× 53 2.0× 7 309
Songsin Photchanachai Thailand 12 212 0.8× 67 1.1× 10 0.2× 50 1.9× 12 0.4× 43 329
Changwen Lu Canada 11 285 1.0× 48 0.8× 15 0.3× 52 1.9× 21 0.8× 26 353
Congcong Song China 11 464 1.7× 54 0.9× 20 0.4× 33 1.2× 8 0.3× 21 538
Felipe Valenzuela-Riffo Chile 13 316 1.1× 48 0.8× 54 1.0× 24 0.9× 19 0.7× 25 385
Andrea Tarazona Spain 11 210 0.8× 98 1.6× 28 0.5× 18 0.7× 21 0.8× 18 310
O.L. Lau Canada 14 445 1.6× 48 0.8× 15 0.3× 27 1.0× 6 0.2× 34 488
Keshavulu Kunusoth India 4 203 0.7× 85 1.4× 11 0.2× 10 0.4× 7 0.3× 6 289

Countries citing papers authored by J.H. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.H. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.H. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.H. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.H. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.H. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.H. Bower. The network helps show where J.H. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.H. Bower

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.H. Bower. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.H. Bower based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.H. Bower. J.H. Bower is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Bower, J.H., William V. Biasi, & Elizabeth Mitcham. (2003). Effect of ethylene in the storage environment on quality of ‘Bartlett pears’. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 28(3). 371–379. 44 indexed citations
2.
Bower, J.H., William V. Biasi, & Elizabeth Mitcham. (2003). Effects of ethylene and 1-MCP on the quality and storage life of strawberries. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 28(3). 417–423. 67 indexed citations
3.
Bower, J.H., Paul Holford, Alain Lachaux, & Jean‐Claude Pech. (2002). Culture conditions and detachment of the fruit influence the effect of ethylene on the climacteric respiration of melon. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 26(2). 135–146. 49 indexed citations
4.
Wang, S, Juming Tang, Jeff Johnson, et al.. (2002). Process protocols based on radio frequency energy to control field and storage pests in in-shell walnuts. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 26(3). 265–273. 111 indexed citations
5.
Pech, J. C., et al.. (2002). ROLE OF ETHYLENE ON VARIOUS RIPENING PATHWAYS AND ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SENSORY QUALITY OF CHARENTAIS CANTALOUPE MELONS. Acta Horticulturae. 303–307. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bower, J.H.. (2001). The relationship between respiration rate and storage life of fresh produce. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bower, J.H., Brian D. Patterson, & J. Jobling. (2000). Permeance to oxygen of detached Capsicum annuum fruit. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 40(3). 457–457. 13 indexed citations
8.
Bower, J.H., et al.. (1999). Oxygen permeance: a method applied to modified atmosphere packages containing fresh plant foods. Packaging Technology and Science. 12(4). 185–191. 6 indexed citations
9.
Bower, J.H., J. Jobling, Brian D. Patterson, & Daniel J. Ryan. (1998). A method for measuring the respiration rate and respiratory quotient of detached plant tissues. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 13(3). 263–270. 26 indexed citations
10.
Farrier, David, et al.. (1977). Acquisition, processing and storage for environmental research of aqueous effluents derived from in situ oil shale processing. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026