J.G. Schepers

3.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
62 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

J.G. Schepers is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Environmental Engineering and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.G. Schepers has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 39 papers in Environmental Engineering and 28 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in J.G. Schepers's work include Wind Energy Research and Development (45 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (39 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (20 papers). J.G. Schepers is often cited by papers focused on Wind Energy Research and Development (45 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (39 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (20 papers). J.G. Schepers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. J.G. Schepers's co-authors include H. Snel, R. J. Barthelmie, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Wolfgang Schlez, K. Rados, Sten Tronæs Frandsen, Stefan Oerlemans, Ole Rathmann, J. Phillips and E. S. Politis and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable Energy, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology and Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

In The Last Decade

J.G. Schepers

59 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Modelling and measuring f... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 2010 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
J.G. Schepers 2.3k 1.5k 1.0k 348 134 62 2.4k
Niels Troldborg 2.4k 1.0× 1.8k 1.2× 1.4k 1.4× 230 0.7× 98 0.7× 82 2.6k
Raúl Bayoán Cal 1.4k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 1.3k 1.3× 169 0.5× 69 0.5× 128 2.1k
Robert Mikkelsen 3.4k 1.5× 2.2k 1.4× 2.5k 2.4× 271 0.8× 210 1.6× 129 3.8k
Abdolrahim Rezaeiha 2.0k 0.9× 1.3k 0.9× 882 0.9× 201 0.6× 95 0.7× 42 2.3k
Majid Bastankhah 2.3k 1.0× 1.5k 1.0× 961 0.9× 507 1.5× 111 0.8× 22 2.4k
Ion Paraschivoiu 1.9k 0.8× 805 0.5× 803 0.8× 134 0.4× 155 1.2× 87 2.0k
Carlos Ferreira 3.0k 1.3× 1.8k 1.2× 1.8k 1.8× 131 0.4× 135 1.0× 176 3.2k
Pierre‐Elouan Réthoré 2.4k 1.0× 1.6k 1.1× 931 0.9× 542 1.6× 112 0.8× 90 2.7k
Gunner Chr. Larsen 3.3k 1.5× 2.4k 1.6× 1.4k 1.4× 751 2.2× 270 2.0× 155 3.8k
Mahdi Abkar 1.2k 0.5× 1.1k 0.7× 953 0.9× 124 0.4× 48 0.4× 62 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by J.G. Schepers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.G. Schepers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.G. Schepers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.G. Schepers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.G. Schepers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.G. Schepers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.G. Schepers. The network helps show where J.G. Schepers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.G. Schepers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.G. Schepers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.G. Schepers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.G. Schepers. J.G. Schepers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schepers, J.G., Adnan Shahid, Andrew Best, et al.. (2024). Lessons learned from 10 years of wind tunnel tests on small wind turbines designed by students. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2767(7). 72009–72009. 2 indexed citations
2.
Boorsma, Koen, J.G. Schepers, Georg Raimund Pirrung, et al.. (2024). Challenges in Rotor Aerodynamic Modeling for Non-Uniform Inflow Conditions. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2767(2). 22006–22006. 1 indexed citations
3.
Herráez, Iván, et al.. (2018). Extraction of the wake induction and angle of attack on rotating wind turbine blades from PIV and CFD results. Wind energy science. 3(1). 1–9. 20 indexed citations
4.
Schepers, J.G., Wen Zhong Shen, H. Rahimi, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of different methods of determining the angle of attack on wind turbine blades under yawed inflow conditions. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1037. 22028–22028. 7 indexed citations
5.
Rahimi, H., et al.. (2018). On the effect of blade deformations on the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine rotors subjected to yawed inflow. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1037. 22030–22030. 3 indexed citations
6.
Boorsma, Koen & J.G. Schepers. (2016). Rotor experiments in controlled conditions continued: New Mexico. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 753. 22004–22004. 19 indexed citations
7.
Schepers, J.G., et al.. (2014). Wake Measurements in ECN's Scaled Wind Farm. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 555. 12105–12105. 2 indexed citations
8.
Schepers, J.G. & Scott Schreck. (2013). The importance of aerodynamics and the role of aerodynamic measurements:. Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft). 1 indexed citations
9.
Schepers, J.G.. (2013). Aerodynamic and acoustic international cooperation projects: How they (should) come together. TNO Repository. 1 indexed citations
10.
Schepers, J.G. & Koen Boorsma. (2012). Enhanced wind turbine noise prediction tool SILANT. TNO Repository. 10 indexed citations
11.
Schepers, J.G.. (2012). Engineering models in wind energy aerodynamics: Development, implementation and analysis using dedicated aerodynamic measurements. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 57 indexed citations
12.
Schepers, J.G., et al.. (2011). Analysis of wake measurements from the ECN Wind Turbine Test Site Wieringermeer, EWTW. Wind Energy. 15(4). 575–591. 43 indexed citations
13.
Snel, H., et al.. (2010). First results from Mexnext: Analysis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on a 4.5 diameter rotor placed in the large German Dutch Wind Tunnel DNW. TNO Repository.
14.
Barthelmie, R. J., E. S. Politis, John Prospathopoulos, et al.. (2008). Flow and wakes in large wind farms in complex terrain and offshore. UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid). 36–40. 29 indexed citations
15.
Schepers, J.G. & S.P. van der Pijl. (2007). Improved modelling of wake aerodynamics and assessment of new farm control strategies. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 75. 12039–12039. 61 indexed citations
16.
Schepers, J.G.. (2004). Annexlyse: Validation of yaw models on basis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on wind turbine blades.. TNO Repository. 1 indexed citations
17.
Schepers, J.G., et al.. (2002). Final report of IEA annex XVIII: Enhanced field rotor aerodynamics database. 30 indexed citations
18.
Schepers, J.G.. (1999). An engineering model for yawed conditions, developed on basis of wind tunnel measurements. 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 41 indexed citations
19.
Schepers, J.G. & H. Snel. (1995). Dynamic inflow. Yawed conditions and partial span pitch control. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 19 indexed citations
20.
Snel, H. & J.G. Schepers. (1992). Engineering moles for dynamic inflow phenomena. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 39(1-3). 267–281. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026