Jessica Delaney
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dan M. RodenJoshua C. DennyAndrea H. RamirezErica BowtonJill M. PulleyDana C. CrawfordDawood DarbarDaniel R. Masys
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers)Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jessica Delaney
23 papers receiving 931 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 413
- Pharmacology 304
- Molecular Biology 278
- Genetics 179
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 110
Countries citing papers authored by Jessica Delaney
This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica Delaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica Delaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica Delaney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica Delaney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica Delaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica Delaney. The network helps show where Jessica Delaney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jessica Delaney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jessica Delaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jessica Delaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jessica Delaney. Jessica Delaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 298 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | Current perspectives on congenital long QT syndrome. | 2 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jessica Delaney
Jessica Delaney is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (304 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (413 citations) and Statistics and Probability (69 citations). Jessica Delaney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dan M. Roden, Joshua C. Denny, Andrea H. Ramirez, Erica Bowton, Jill M. Pulley, Dana C. Crawford, Dawood Darbar, Daniel R. Masys, D M Roden and Christian M. Shaffer. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.