Jens Klump

1.5k total citations
83 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jens Klump is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Klump has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Information Systems, 28 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 24 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Jens Klump's work include Research Data Management Practices (30 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (24 papers) and Data Quality and Management (15 papers). Jens Klump is often cited by papers focused on Research Data Management Practices (30 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (24 papers) and Data Quality and Management (15 papers). Jens Klump collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Jens Klump's co-authors include Dierk Hebbeln, Gerold Wefer, Gert J. de Lange, Anja Reitz, Klaus Pfeifer, Judith M. Schicks, Francky Fouedjio, Ronny Giese, Erik Spangenberg and Robert Huber and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

Jens Klump

79 papers receiving 972 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jens Klump Australia 16 297 244 239 197 155 83 1.0k
Kerstin Lehnert United States 15 207 0.7× 192 0.8× 129 0.5× 84 0.4× 338 2.2× 89 1.5k
J. Helly United States 14 188 0.6× 156 0.6× 540 2.3× 111 0.6× 71 0.5× 44 1.7k
Lesley Wyborn Australia 18 172 0.6× 140 0.6× 66 0.3× 16 0.1× 708 4.6× 75 1.5k
T. Whiteaker United States 11 94 0.3× 163 0.7× 182 0.8× 33 0.2× 81 0.5× 20 714
Xuan Yu China 21 56 0.2× 77 0.3× 258 1.1× 204 1.0× 48 0.3× 82 1.5k
Michael Lautenschlager Germany 15 118 0.4× 123 0.5× 417 1.7× 90 0.5× 40 0.3× 43 726
Michael Piasecki United States 13 123 0.4× 175 0.7× 44 0.2× 18 0.1× 140 0.9× 57 643
Joseph Hamman United States 14 35 0.1× 69 0.3× 600 2.5× 64 0.3× 93 0.6× 36 1.6k
Roland J. Viger United States 20 12 0.0× 41 0.2× 443 1.9× 154 0.8× 82 0.5× 48 1.8k
Chao Ma China 23 18 0.1× 9 0.0× 611 2.6× 95 0.5× 272 1.8× 83 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Klump

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Klump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Klump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Klump more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Klump

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Klump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Klump. The network helps show where Jens Klump may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Klump

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Klump. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Klump based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Klump. Jens Klump is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ding, Ming, et al.. (2024). Trusted data sharing for mineral exploration and mining tenements. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 267. 107580–107580. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sadeghi, Behnam, Ahmed Eleish, Shaunna M. Morrison, & Jens Klump. (2024). Inverse radius weighting and its python package “IRWPy”: A new topography-informed interpolation to enhance geological interpretations. Ore Geology Reviews. 172. 106206–106206. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lindsay, Mark, et al.. (2024). Assessing named entity recognition efficacy using diverse geoscience datasets. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 1–3.
4.
Klump, Jens, Kerstin Lehnert, Anusuriya Devaraju, et al.. (2021). Towards Globally Unique Identification of Physical Samples: Governance and Technical Implementation of the IGSN Global Sample Number. Data Science Journal. 20. 9 indexed citations
5.
Robertson, James, et al.. (2020). Building Community and Road-Testing the New IGSN System Architecture. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2020. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lehnert, Kerstin, et al.. (2019). IGSN: Trustworthy and Sustainable Services for FAIR Samples. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 11617. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lehnert, Kerstin & Jens Klump. (2018). IGSN: Toward a Mature and Generic Persistent Identifier for Samples. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018. 1 indexed citations
8.
Elger, Kirsten, et al.. (2016). panMetaDocs, eSciDoc, and DOIDB—An Infrastructure for the Curation and Publication of File-Based Datasets for GFZ Data Services. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 5(3). 25–25. 5 indexed citations
9.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2015). Curating the web’s deep past – Migration strategies for the German Continental Deep Drilling Program web content. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 6. 98–105. 4 indexed citations
10.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2014). Automatic publishing ISO 19115 metadata with PanMetaDocs using SensorML information. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2597.
11.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2014). Linking descriptive geology and quantitative machine learning through an ontology of lithological concepts. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014. 1 indexed citations
12.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2014). Numerical modeling of the simulated gas hydrate production test at Mallik 2L-38 in the pilot scale pressure reservoir LARS - Applying the "foamy oil" model. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 3843. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pampel, Heinz, et al.. (2014). Making Research Data Repositories Visible:The re3data.org Registry. Shuju fenxi yu zhishi faxian. 30(3). 26–34. 4 indexed citations
14.
Pampel, Heinz, et al.. (2013). Schema for the description of research data repositories. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 1 indexed citations
15.
Klump, Jens & Kerstin Lehnert. (2013). Use-cases and services for unique identifiers in the geological sciences. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 15. 1 indexed citations
16.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2012). Re-using the DataCite Metadata Store as DOI registration proxy and IGSN registry. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2012. 1 indexed citations
17.
Klump, Jens, et al.. (2012). Publishing datasets with eSciDoc and panMetaDocs. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 7058. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lehnert, Kerstin, Jens Klump, R. A. Arko, et al.. (2011). IGSN e.V.: Registration and Identification Services for Physical Samples in the Digital Universe. AGUFM. 2011. 5 indexed citations
19.
Snyder, W.S., et al.. (2008). GeosciNET: Building a Global Geoinformatics Partnership. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2008. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lehnert, Kerstin, et al.. (2006). The Digital Sample: Metadata, Unique Identification, and Links to Data and Publications. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026