C. J. Crosby

1.5k total citations
58 papers, 969 citations indexed

About

C. J. Crosby is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Geophysics and Geochemistry and Petrology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. J. Crosby has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 969 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Environmental Engineering, 15 papers in Geophysics and 11 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology. Recurrent topics in C. J. Crosby's work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (17 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (13 papers) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (10 papers). C. J. Crosby is often cited by papers focused on Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (17 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (13 papers) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (10 papers). C. J. Crosby collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. C. J. Crosby's co-authors include J Ramón Arrowsmith, Chaitanya Baru, Sriram Krishnan, Minh Q. Phan, Stephen B. DeLong, David G. Tarboton, Paola Passalacqua, Thad Wasklewicz, Dimitri Lague and Joseph M. Wheaton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Geology and Earth-Science Reviews.

In The Last Decade

C. J. Crosby

56 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. J. Crosby United States 16 270 222 192 166 166 58 969
Junko Iwahashi Japan 13 291 1.1× 271 1.2× 111 0.6× 546 3.3× 183 1.1× 32 1.1k
Ronald G. Blom United States 17 412 1.5× 239 1.1× 128 0.7× 259 1.6× 394 2.4× 50 1.6k
R. Yokoyama Japan 11 268 1.0× 40 0.2× 144 0.8× 136 0.8× 202 1.2× 53 754
Antonio Miguel Ruiz-Armenteros Spain 18 204 0.8× 227 1.0× 102 0.5× 236 1.4× 251 1.5× 68 1.1k
Philippa J. Mason United Kingdom 18 230 0.9× 142 0.6× 156 0.8× 414 2.5× 299 1.8× 58 1.3k
Günter Strunz Germany 14 80 0.3× 177 0.8× 111 0.6× 82 0.5× 244 1.5× 65 1.0k
Ziyin Wu China 19 137 0.5× 109 0.5× 307 1.6× 26 0.2× 220 1.3× 81 1.2k
Joachim Post Germany 15 71 0.3× 189 0.9× 88 0.5× 48 0.3× 195 1.2× 46 845
Lydia Sam United Kingdom 19 190 0.7× 74 0.3× 117 0.6× 169 1.0× 643 3.9× 48 1.2k
Sadra Karımzadeh Iran 20 181 0.7× 228 1.0× 95 0.5× 248 1.5× 164 1.0× 55 974

Countries citing papers authored by C. J. Crosby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. J. Crosby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. J. Crosby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. J. Crosby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. J. Crosby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. J. Crosby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. J. Crosby. The network helps show where C. J. Crosby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. J. Crosby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. J. Crosby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. J. Crosby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. J. Crosby. C. J. Crosby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sofia, Giulia, Anette Eltner, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, & C. J. Crosby. (2019). Leading Progress in Digital Terrain Analysis and Modeling. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 8(9). 372–372. 5 indexed citations
2.
Scott, Chelsea, et al.. (2019). On-Demand 3D topographic differencing hosted by OpenTopography. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019. 2 indexed citations
3.
Dixon, Neil, C. J. Crosby, Ross Stirling, et al.. (2018). In situ measurements of near-surface hydraulic conductivity in engineered clay slopes. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 52(1). 123–135. 21 indexed citations
4.
Manighetti, Isabelle, Frédérique Leclerc, Chelsea Scott, et al.. (2018). Tectonic Damage Zones: How Large Across Faults? Insight From Empirical Scaling Relations in Granite Dells Fault Zone, Arizona, USA. AGUFM. 2018. 1 indexed citations
5.
Beckley, Matthew, et al.. (2018). A Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data Archive for Multi-Temporal Mapping Across Research Disciplines. AGUFM. 2018.
6.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2014). OpenTopography: Addressing Big Data Challenges Using Cloud Computing, HPC, and Data Analytics. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2014. 1 indexed citations
7.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2013). Points2Grid: An Efficient Local Gridding Method for DEM Generation from Lidar Point Cloud Data. Geosphere. 3 indexed citations
8.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2013). Development of an Online Archive for Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data. EGUGA. 13334. 1 indexed citations
9.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2013). OpenTopography: Enabling Online Access to High-Resolution Lidar Topography Data and Processing Tools. EGUGA. 13326. 6 indexed citations
10.
Baru, Chaitanya, et al.. (2008). Integrating Diverse Geophysical and Geological Data to Construct Multi-Dimensional Earth Models: The Open Earth Framework. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008. 1 indexed citations
11.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2007). The Hunt for Surface Rupture From the 1889 Ms 8.3 Chilik Earthquake, Northern Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007. 6 indexed citations
12.
Crosby, C. J., et al.. (2006). Enhanced Access to High-Resolution LiDAR Topography through Cyberinfrastructure- Based Data Distribution and Processing. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006. 2 indexed citations
13.
Arrowsmith, J Ramón, et al.. (2006). An Efficient Implementation of a Local Binning Algorithm for Digital Elevation Model Generation of LiDAR/ALSM Dataset. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006. 19 indexed citations
14.
Korjenkov, A.M., et al.. (2006). Direct seismogenic destruction of the Kamenka medieval fortress, northern Issyk-Kul region, Tien Shan. Journal of Seismology. 1 indexed citations
15.
Arrowsmith, R., et al.. (2006). Tectonic geomorphology and earthquake geology of the 1857 reach of the San Andreas Fault: a new look from Airborne Laser Swath Mapping. AGUFM. 2006. 1 indexed citations
16.
Arrowsmith, J Ramón, et al.. (2005). Surface rupture of the 1911 Kebin (Chon-Kemin) earthquake, Northern Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2005. 7 indexed citations
17.
Crosby, C. J., J Ramón Arrowsmith, John S. Oldow, & C. S. Prentice. (2004). Exploiting LiDAR for Regional Morphologic Correlation and Dating of Wave-cut and Fault-Controlled Landforms. AGUFM. 2004. 1 indexed citations
18.
Arrowsmith, J Ramón, et al.. (2004). Surface rupture along the Chon Aksu and Aksu (eastern) segments of the 1911 Kebin (Chon-Kemin) earthquake, Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan. AGUFM. 2004. 5 indexed citations
19.
Prentice, C. S., C. J. Crosby, Ralph A. Haugerud, et al.. (2003). Northern California LIDAR Data: A Tool for Mapping the San Andreas Fault and Pleistocene Marine Terraces in Heavily Vegetated Terrain. AGUFM. 2003. 10 indexed citations
20.
Fenton, Clark, et al.. (2002). Paleoseismic Evidence for Prehistoric Earthquakes on the Northern Maacama Fault, Willits, California. AGUFM. 2002. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026