Robert R. Downs

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
60 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

Robert R. Downs is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert R. Downs has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Information Systems, 39 papers in Information Systems and Management and 20 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Robert R. Downs's work include Research Data Management Practices (39 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (37 papers) and Data Quality and Management (20 papers). Robert R. Downs is often cited by papers focused on Research Data Management Practices (39 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (37 papers) and Data Quality and Management (20 papers). Robert R. Downs collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Robert R. Downs's co-authors include Robert S. Chen, H. K. Ramapriyan, Ruth Duerr, Ingrid Dillo, Marisa Raquel De Giusti, Dawei Lin, Rorie Edmunds, Jonathan Crabtree, Reyna Jenkyns and Martina Stockhause and has published in prestigious journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Eos and Information Processing & Management.

In The Last Decade

Robert R. Downs

56 papers receiving 458 citations

Hit Papers

The TRUST Principles for digital repositories 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert R. Downs United States 11 304 245 126 76 44 60 491
Andrew Treloar Australia 11 284 0.9× 229 0.9× 119 0.9× 45 0.6× 31 0.7× 52 434
P. Bryan Heidorn United States 9 371 1.2× 262 1.1× 155 1.2× 79 1.0× 32 0.7× 33 576
Nicholas Weber United States 12 180 0.6× 157 0.6× 87 0.7× 54 0.7× 41 0.9× 58 459
Shelley Stall United States 9 234 0.8× 173 0.7× 79 0.6× 84 1.1× 12 0.3× 32 563
Jillian C. Wallis United States 12 629 2.1× 536 2.2× 298 2.4× 76 1.0× 33 0.8× 28 788
Donatella Castelli Italy 16 409 1.3× 332 1.4× 125 1.0× 164 2.2× 160 3.6× 62 765
Paolo Manghi Italy 14 365 1.2× 287 1.2× 146 1.2× 213 2.8× 129 2.9× 88 669
Melissa H. Cragin United States 12 511 1.7× 387 1.6× 247 2.0× 49 0.6× 27 0.6× 31 740
David Giaretta United Kingdom 10 242 0.8× 168 0.7× 64 0.5× 68 0.9× 67 1.5× 43 458
Ruth Duerr United States 10 207 0.7× 175 0.7× 113 0.9× 65 0.9× 20 0.5× 42 367

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Downs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Downs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Downs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Downs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Downs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Downs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Downs. The network helps show where Robert R. Downs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert R. Downs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert R. Downs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert R. Downs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert R. Downs. Robert R. Downs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
O’Brien, Margaret, Ruth Duerr, Andrew Martinez, et al.. (2024). Earth Science Data Repositories: Implementing the CARE Principles. Data Science Journal. 23. 6 indexed citations
3.
Downs, Robert R., Qi Xu, Juanle Wang, et al.. (2023). Harvestable Metadata Services Development: Analysis of Use Cases from the World Data System. Data Science Journal. 22. 1 indexed citations
4.
Peng, Ge, Robert R. Downs, H. K. Ramapriyan, et al.. (2022). Global Community Guidelines for Documenting, Sharing, and Reusing Quality Information of Individual Digital Datasets. Data Science Journal. 21. 14 indexed citations
5.
Downs, Robert R., et al.. (2021). Documentation to Foster Sharing and Use of Open Earth Science Data: Quality Information. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
6.
Downs, Robert R., et al.. (2021). A Review of Open Research Data Policies and Practices in China. Data Science Journal. 20. 13 indexed citations
7.
Downs, Robert R.. (2021). Improving Opportunities for New Value of Open Data: Assessing and Certifying Research Data Repositories. Data Science Journal. 20. 9 indexed citations
8.
Lin, Dawei, Jonathan Crabtree, Ingrid Dillo, et al.. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data. 7(1). 144–144. 189 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Ramapriyan, H. K., Jonathan Hobbs, Robert R. Downs, et al.. (2019). Understanding the Various Perspectives of Earth Science Observational Data Uncertainty. Figshare. 2 indexed citations
10.
Downs, Robert R.. (2019). International Standards for Trustworthy Data Repositories. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Dillo, Ingrid, Hervé L’Hours, Robert R. Downs, et al.. (2019). CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022 : CoreTrustSeal Standards and Certification Board. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
12.
Dillo, Ingrid, Hervé L’Hours, Robert R. Downs, et al.. (2019). CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements: Extended Guidance 2020–2022. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
13.
Dillo, Ingrid, et al.. (2017). The Perceived Value of Acquiring Data Seals of Approval. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic. 12(1). 130–151. 6 indexed citations
14.
Downs, Robert R.. (2015). Progress on the Management, Curation, and Preservation of Geospatial Data. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries. 11(3). 267–270. 2 indexed citations
15.
Downs, Robert R., et al.. (2013). Assessing the Interdisciplinary Use of Socioeconomic and Remote Sensing Data in the Earth Sciences. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013. 1 indexed citations
16.
Downs, Robert R. & Robert S. Chen. (2010). Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as a Trustworthy Digital Repository. Texas Digital Library (University of Texas). 11(1). 4. 12 indexed citations
17.
Downs, Robert R., et al.. (2009). Measuring Software Reusability for Scientific Data Systems. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009. 1 indexed citations
18.
Chen, Robert S. & Robert R. Downs. (2009). Conducting a Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as a Trustworthy Digital Repository. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
19.
Burrows, Hugh D., Robert R. Downs, Stephan Falke, et al.. (2007). A Community-Developed Measurement of the Reusability of Software Through Reuse Readiness Levels. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007. 2 indexed citations
20.
Downs, Robert R., et al.. (2006). The Software Reuse Portal: A Case Study in Packaging Software to Contribute to Reuse Practices. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026