Jens G. Rohwer

2.4k citations
47 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 20

Jens G. Rohwer

43 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jens G. Rohwer
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
  • Equine 46
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Horticulture 15
  • Plant Science 500
Replace Joseph H. Williams with:
Joseph H. Williams United States
Christiane Kiefer Germany
Yu‐Chung Chiang Taiwan
Katsuhiko Kondo Japan
André S. Chanderbali United States
Jaakko Hyvönen Finland
Robert Grant‐Downton United Kingdom
Terezie Mandáková Czechia
Albert G. Abbott United States
Jean-François Manen Switzerland
Jens G. Rohwer relative to Joseph H. Williams United States Joseph H. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Joseph H. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens G. Rohwer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens G. Rohwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens G. Rohwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens G. Rohwer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens G. Rohwer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens G. Rohwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens G. Rohwer. The network helps show where Jens G. Rohwer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jens G. Rohwer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens G. Rohwer Line = papers co-authored together Jens G. Rohwer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20240
3 20230
4 202223
5 202111
6 201713
7 201745
8 20174
9 201717
10 201573
11 201232
12 201184
13 200915
14
Jumping genera: the phylogenetic positions of Cassytha, Hypodaphnis, and Neocinnamomum (Lauraceae) based on different analyses of trnK intron sequences
200582
15 2003423
16 200388
17
Flowering plants, dicotyledons : magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families
199365
18 19892
19 198412
20
Die harmonischen Grundlagen der Musik
19701

About Jens G. Rohwer

Jens G. Rohwer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Horticulture and Equine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (34 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (26 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations), Equine (46 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). Jens G. Rohwer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include K. Kubitzki, Barbara Rudolph, Volker Bittrich, Henk van der Werff, Peter F. Stevens, Jie Li, Pedro Luís Rodrigues de Moraes, Hsi‐Wen Li, Lawrence A. Alice and Rodger C. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Systematic Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026