Joseph H. Williams
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- William E. FriedmanA. HempelJohn M. BurkeDaniel J. HowardWilliam J. BoecklenMichael L. ArnoldJ. E. SpechtCharles Y. Sullivan
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (25 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (18 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (17 papers)
- Journals
- NatureProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilChina
In The Last Decade
Joseph H. Williams
45 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 993
- Genetics 390
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 253
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph H. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph H. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph H. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph H. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph H. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph H. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph H. Williams. The network helps show where Joseph H. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph H. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph H. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph H. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph H. Williams. Joseph H. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 109 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 123 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 117 | |
| 19 | 82 | |
| 20 | Research notes: Hilum color as a genetic marker in soybean crosses | 1 |
About Joseph H. Williams
Joseph H. Williams is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (25 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (18 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (253 citations). Joseph H. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and China. Frequent co-authors include William E. Friedman, A. Hempel, John M. Burke, Daniel J. Howard, William J. Boecklen, Michael L. Arnold, J. E. Specht, Charles Y. Sullivan, Ralph W. Preszler and Michael T. Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.